ASIAN EYES OF THE ALIENS

ASIAN EYES OF THE ALIENS

by Ufonalyzer 8/4/2009



The Ufonalyzer is not the first to note that so many of the alien sighting close encounters describe the eyes of the beings as “Oriental.” He recalls that one of Timothy Good’s books addresses this subject. Ufonalyzer’s alien encounter spreadsheet at:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=tEs6J6ak0RuSE-2P1z9DCjQ&hl=en
lists data from 234 alien close encounters from 1933 to 1996. Of the 53 sightings where the witness got a good enough view of an alien to describe its eyes, 13 used words like slanted, oriental, chinese, asian, narrow, oblique, and slit. 3 of the 13 used the word “oriental”. Thirteen (13) of 53 is 25%. This might not seem like a disproportionately large percentage because the percentage on earth for this characteristic is at least that high. However, this IS a high percentage considering that these are aliens, not humans, so their eyes could be red, violet with no pupils, vertical almonds, hemispherical bumps like a spider’s, and so forth. But read on.

This writeup was triggered by a couple of events. While reading one of the Majestic documents to be found at http://www.majesticdocuments.com/, a document was found describing the dead aliens from Roswell. The document is entitled, “Twining’s ‘White Hot’ Report”, dated 9/19/1947. A blacked out word was encountered in the following sentence: “Autopsy information obtained so far suggests that the occupants mimic the featuers (sic) associated with blacked out.” Someone had written the word “Orientals” in the margin by the blacked out patch. Ufonalyzer’s theory is that the original word may have either been ‘orientals’ or it could have been ‘mongoloid’ which is a synonym that someone decided to put in the margin to elucidate the blacked out typed word. The blackout clerk subsequently missed blacking out the margin. It was kind of a weird choice of a word to black out because this “fact” about eye shape was not important at all compared to the national secrets in the rest of the document which were not blacked out.

A second event which triggered this writeup occurred during the Binnall radio show. Binnall recently had a Season IV guest named Bruce Rux talking about a subject he (Rux) knows well as a former actor. Mr Rux authored a large book some years ago entitled “Hollywood vs the Aliens.” He made that claim that Ian Fleming, author of the James Bond 007 books, was in a position to know UK government inside information about top secret issues, and Mr. Rux gives a supporting fact about a code device which was a top secret during WWII and which Ian Fleming was quite knowledgeable about. This code device later appeared under a different name in “From Russia with Love.” This means that Ian Fleming was willing to take things he learned as a secret agent and put them into his books. Mr Rux went on to claim that in Fleming’s 1958 book, “Dr. No” (not the movie), Dr. No was a grey. This so intrigued the Ufonalyzer that he got a copy of that book from the library. Alas, he does not buy into Mr. Rux’s claim. Dr. No was an Asian oriental. He was 6’ tall, and he did have a hairless, eyebrowless, tear drop shaped head as a grey would. However, his head was not oversized and neither were his eyes. It's possible that Mr. Fleming got cold feet while writing the book and held back on all the details that he knew about greys. But what Ian Fleming did put out there in his book does not cross the line toward convincing this writer that Dr. No was a grey.

The final example of the strange connections between aliens and orientals is the book by respected Australian ufologist, Bill Chalker. This book is the “Hair of the Alien”, 2005. The Ufonalyzer has not read this book yet, but has read the synopsis of it. The story is told by a man named Peter Khoury about his experience on July 23,1992, in Sydney, Australia. This is basically an abduction story which later has some hypnotic memory recovery in it. The events which follow were remembered unassisted; the hypnosis came later. On that night, he found two women seated on a bed in his home, one blond and the other dark haired and oriental looking. The blond had a very long face, a long nose, and protruding, very high cheeks. Her eyes were two or three times bigger than a normal human’s eyes. Mouth and lips were normal size. She was naked and well proportioned. Her chin was pointier than a human’s, like a movie witch’s long chin. Her eyes were light colored, maybe bluish. She seemed very tall, well over 6 feet. The Asian woman was about 5’8”, also with the oversized eyes but very black eyes and black hair. Her cheekbones were very pronounced and the cheeks were very puffy. He could tell that neither were human. Mr. Khoury is six feet tall and worked in the building trades, yet the blond grabbed him and pulled him to her. He could tell she was stronger than he was. The blond seemed to be instructing the Oriental looking alien, although no words were spoken. Their communication apparently was telepathic. Mr. Khoury claims that he resisted her advances, and the next day he found two blond hairs wrapped around part of his anatomy which he kept in a plastic bag for a few years. Anyhow, the bottom line is that a DNA analysis was made of the blond’s hair. It turned out to be closely genetically linked to Chinese DNA but with some startling differences. Anyhow, that’s the partial story. The physical description of the blond closely matches two spreadsheet alien descriptions of male aliens: (1) 2/5/1978 in Algora, Spain. The male was human size, blue eyes which were double human size, with huge parietal bones (our blond in this story did not have the large parietals.)He had a very long pointed chin, no eyebrows, eyelashes, or hair. (2) 7/31/1975 in Loxton, South Africa. The male had slanted eyes, fair hair, and sharp pointed chin. His height was estimated to be 1.5 meters.

Mr Chalker’s book is still available.

Can some species of aliens be more closely linked to Asians than to Caucasians and Negroes for example? Are Asians the latest genetic experiment by certain aliens? What can one make of all this? Probably nothing, but it makes interesting reading.

©