GREYS ASCENDANT

GREYS ASCENDANT by Ufonalyzer 2/2010

The graph you see at the top of this writeup is interesting, to say the least. It shows that Close Encounters of the Third Kind (CE3) percentages of greys are rising. The date on the graph should be 1/2010, not 1/2009. As a past technical person, the Ufonalyzer really thinks this graph is so smooth and clean that it looks like a fake. Believe the Ufonalyzer when he says that the data for this graph was not cherry picked. It is only 6 data points, one for each decade from the 50’s to the present, but each data point took hours to calculate. It was totally unknown to the Ufonalyzer if the data would show a scattered bunch of nothing or if it would show a smooth trend. It shows a smooth trend.

The methodology of creating this graph will be discussed a few paragraphs from this one. Let us for the moment accept the graph as accurate and discuss its implications especially in light of other writeups that the U has done.

Ufologists have noted that in the early years of UFO awareness starting in 1947, few if any greys were sighted (see Ufonalyzer’s CE3 spreadsheet posted at http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aj0F2i1zgohJdEVzNko2YWswUnVTRS0yUDF6OURDalE&hl=en ). However, they were here before 1954 as proven by the SOM1-01 April,1954 document which lists two alien species, one of which is almost certainly a grey. This document is considered by top ufologists as a real publication of the US government. Public awareness of greys started with the Betty and Barney Hill abduction story in 1961. Since then, the greys seem to be the dominant species mentioned in abduction studies. This graph now proves that they are now the dominant species in simple UFO landing CE3 cases as well, no abductions included. Wait a minute you say, that graph shows that only 30% of the modern sightings are of greys. That is hardly dominant. The answer to this is that the 70% undefined sightings definitely include greys, but in most of those cases the witness did not supply enough facts to classify the beings into any category at all. Had there been sufficient descriptions to use to classify the cases, the grey percentage would have been even higher. Even so, the trend here is correct; greys are ascendant on earth. (OR else the reports are false or inaccurate, and the alien descriptions are dominated by mass media influence which concentrates on the grey body type.) Please realize that it is the percentage of grey sightings that is rising, but the overall number of sightings, greys included, could possibly be decreasing as is suggested by another of Ufonalyzer’s graphs in his blog writeup, “UPDATES: UFO WAVES GRAPH AND CLOSE ENCOUNTERS SPREADSHEET WITH A RETRACTION OF A PREVIOUSLY MADE CLAIM” published in February, 2010.

The graph stands alone. It is not speculative. It is data driven. It is objective. It is repeatable. It bypasses other peoples’ interpretations of what is being seen because it is based on raw thumbnail sightings by ordinary citizens across the world which have been collected by UFO enthusiasts over the decades. It bears repeating that these sightings are filtered, yet false claims could easily get through the filter. Let us explain the simple methodology behind the graph numbers and leave it at that. If you read the Ufonalyzer’s blog, you must have seen the CE3 spreadsheet which lists about 300 alien close encounters starting in 1933. Another study of a separate source of encounter data was found (Albert Rosales’ website) and an identical study was made on this data about aliens. The results from the second set of data matched the results of the first; i.e. the same UFO waves have occurred and the vast number of species visiting, and the increase in the percentage of grey encounters.

Both data sources had to be filtered with severe criteria to get at the true alien sightings.* For example, if only a UFO was witnessed but no alien was observed, it was thrown out. If an alien was observed but no craft was present, it was thrown out. And so forth. The filtering was necessary to get rid of abduction cases, UFO only cases (i.e. no beings reported), werewolves, chupacabras, you name it. The filtering criteria can be viewed in Ufonalyzer’s writeup, “UPDATE: CLOSE ENCOUNTERS SPREADSHEET” published in February, 2010. Then the final data was inspected against a second set of criteria to judge whether or not the aliens observed were probably greys. This second set criteria is as follows:

Grey Criteria
Less than 5.5’ tall
Long arms
Big eyes
Big head (oversized wrt human)
Grey, greenish, brown skin
No/small ears
Thin
Any # of digits allowed
Naked allowed

Not Grey Criteria
Large Ears
Helmeted or assisted breathing
Heavy set, muscular, broad
Any hair, including bearded
Insufficient/no alien data from witness

Two, sometimes three, of the “Grey Criteria” were needed to be judged a possible grey, and one of them must be height.
Any one of the “Not Grey Criteria” ruled out being a grey.

Anyhow, after all this filtering and processing, you can see the end result on the graph.

Greys may have started to force out the other species of aliens, or there may be so many here that they dominate sighting by simple numbers, while the activities of the other species continues unabated and undiminished. Either way, the sightings of greys would rise on a percentage basis. The Ufonalyzer votes for the former (that is, force out), because total sightings appear to be diminishing as shown by Ufonalyzer’s graph in his writeup, “UPDATE: UFO WAVES GRAPH…” previously mentioned. Thus, the greys appear to be in control. This means that they are the dominant alien species on earth.

Incidentally, the phrase on the graph, "80's:Starwars Deployment" was put on the graph under a theory that Star Wars was put in place to keep aliens away from earth unless the aliens were of the type that Eisenhower allegedly made a deal with. It was anticipated that the number of UFO encounters would dramatically drop off after the deployment of this weapons system, leaving the bulk of the sightings to be the favored group, i.e. greys. It was speculated that Star Wars weapons would be outfitted with IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) modules to transpond with the favored group so as to not fire upon that group. Unfortunately, it is still too early to tell if overall UFO sightings have dropped off, but indications are that they have not dropped off. This means the theory is wrong.

In closing, as further support for the contents of this writeup, here are a couple of close encounters from Albert Rosales’ website at: http://www.ufoinfo.com/humanoid/
The Ufonalyzer has taken the liberty of italicizing and embolding the critical part of these close encounter stories. Could these stories be fake?

Case # 97.
Location. Near Querataro, Mexico
Date: April 22 1975
Time: daytime
An extraterrestrial woman named "Lya" meets professor Hernandez in a car and drive to an isolated area (witness involved in previous encounters), they walked about 100 meters on foot there they are met by a saucer about 3 meters in diameter. Lya takes out a small handheld instrument and an opening becomes visible on the saucer, they then embark. Soon Hernandez realizes he is orbiting the earth and sees several satellites in space. The conversation is mostly about ecological concerns mainly about coming climatic changes. They mention the ozone layer, deserts, forests, etc. The aliens say that all nuclear tests must come to a complete halt. Hernandez is later brought back to his vehicle. He is told that their group was leaving earth and was going to be replaced by a more aggressive extraterrestrial race mostly responsible for forced abductions and animal mutilations. Hernandez mysteriously disappears in February 2 1984 and is never heard from again.

Source: Montiel and Stevens, UFO Contact from Andromeda 1989

Case # 40.
Location. Catemaco, Mexico
Date: March 20 1993
Time: 0500A
Mr. Julio Chagala was sleeping at home when suddenly a bright blue light entered through his window and woke him up. Everything seemed to be very still and all the surroundings were enveloped in that strange blue light. Looking out the window he saw a gold colored disc shaped object about 15 meters in diameter land on a nearby field, the craft was totally silent. A hatch opened and several huge figures came out. These were about 2.50 meters in height, human like, wearing tight fitting silvery diver's outfits. They had long arms, pale complexions, large blue slanted eyes, and long golden-blond hair. The witness at this time had walked over to the craft. The visitors saluted him with a gloved hand wave and then invited him inside the craft. Once inside the witness noticed that the humanoids also had long pointed ears. He also saw numerous consoles and what appeared to be comfortable seats, he also saw a metallic table with several different instruments. One of the humanoids showed him a screen where he saw scenes of war, destruction, and ecological collapse. The craft then landed in an unknown beautiful city, filled with humans of all ages. A large golden sun illuminated the city. He was taken to a crystalline waterfall that was surrounded by beautiful colored stones. There the humanoids explained to Mr. Chagala that his destiny was that of caring and healing his fellow human beings. He was also told that the humanoids had several bases in the area that included one at the Ixtamalapan Lagoon. Chagala was also warned of a different type of humanoid that also visited earth and were the ones responsible for the reported animal mutilations. These were described by his hosts as the short large headed humanoids with huge black eyes, with four fingered hands and protruding stomachs that mostly wore tight fitting maroon outfits and traveled in small flying craft with ball landing gear. Mr. Chagala was eventually returned to his home. He reported a drastic lost of weight soon after the incident but recovered. Other locals reported low flying lighted objects over the area about the same time. Currently Mr. Chagala is a known healer that uses natural herbs and remedies.
Source: Grupo Cassiopeia Mexico

* The first 3 bars on the graph used data from the Ufonalyzer’s spreadsheet of ~300 Close Encounters, and the second 3 bars used data from Albert Rosales’ website. The Rosales data could also have sourced data for the first 3 graph bars, but that would have required going back through 30 years of these sightings (thousands). Having read through them once looking for other sighting data, it was too much work to go back through them to collect alien physical data. It was easier to use the spreadsheet data instead.
©