ALIEN RADIX: The Shape of Things That Come

ALIEN RADIX: The Shape of Things That Come
My new book; buy it on Amazon

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Alien Conflict: Earth versus the Aliens

July 15,2011    ©

Alien Conflict: Earth versus the Aliens


Originally published July, 2011:  My book, “Alien Radix: The Shape of Things That Come” has a chapter in it entitled, “Alien Conflict” which is a compilation of reports of alien-on-alien hostilities. This article deals with the other side of the picture, which would be alien-on-human hostilities.
 I have read and watched many scifi books and movies over the years and can attest to the large quantities of fiction that have been created to cover the possible alien invasion and takeover of earth.  Then it dawned on me, almost startling me, that none of the UFO books that I’ve read have ever covered the scenario of such a thing. Sure there might be a mention of it, but no reasoned out scenario. Of course, there is probably something that has been done that I do not know about, but I have read a lot of these UFO books and there has been nothing about it so far. It is pretty obvious that this is one of those psychological avoidance issues so common in the UFO field. This is a very unpleasant thing to think about and so maybe that is why no one has covered it yet, until now. For sure, our government has generated lots of reports and studies on this very subject because it is their job to look for threats, and this would be a threat of the highest priority.   But in the public domain, there is hardly anything about what such a takeover attempt might be like.
After giving this some thought, it became clear that most of the bullet points that will be developed in this paper will state what the conflict will not be like, instead of what it will be like. In many cases the bullet points will state what may not occur which is weaker but the best I can do. Along the way, I will also give my opinion on alien-human warfare as well.
So let me begin my bullet points of the type of war we would have with aliens who wish to take over the earth.

1. A WAR BETWEEN EARTH AND AN ALIEN FORCE:
1.       WOULD BE ASYMMETRIC.
An asymmetric war is a lopsided war, where one side has disproportionate resources or uses a weapon or tactic that the other side is not ready for. Wikipedia has a good treatment of asymmetric war, so I will not go deeply into it. Our armed forces are mainly structured for large scale confrontations with similarly equipped hostile forces. We have an army, navy and air force, but so does every other major power in the world. A guerilla war allows a weaker force to hassle a more powerful one, and if it lasts long enough, the major power might give up the conflict in frustration. So an asymmetric war can sometimes be won by a weaker power simply due to the asymmetry involved.  In my opinion, the end of WWII became asymmetric when we deployed our super weapon, the A-bomb, which the enemy was not ready for. We were not the weaker power, but used asymmetry to our advantage nevertheless. Nowadays, wars can have an asymmetric component that works in harmony with the conventional components. Cyber warfare departments exist in the USA, China, USSR, North Korea, and several other places. A physical attack from a hostile country which also has the cyber warfare department would occur with that department hacking and destroying what they can of our military command and control structure. They would also disrupt the power grid to deny electricity to big parts of the country.  They will do their best to deter and disrupt military and domestic operations through electronic means, thereby reducing the effectiveness of any response. A quote from the book, “Cyber War”, by Richard A. Clarke* and Robert Knake follows: “In the case of cyber war, the power of the offense is largely secret...” You may remember Richard A. Clarke. He is the guy who warned Condoleezza Rice that a terror attack might occur soon against the USA about 8 months before 9/11/2001. Now, we are discussing alien war here, so substitute the word “alien” for the word “cyber” and you get the main crux of the problem with alien warfare: “In the case of alien war, the power of the offense is largely secret...” We simply don’t have a clue what weapons of offense the aliens have. In the movie, “Independence Day”, the aliens had a primary weapon which would somehow cause an explosion to radiate outward from the targeted center of every major city. In the remake of “The Day the Earth Stood Still”, the aliens had an undefensible weapon like a cloud of insects or nano-technology particles that would eat everything in sight. In the book, “Battlefield Earth” by L. Ron Hubbard, the aliens simply put a lot of poison gas into a single rocket which traveled a few hundred miles an hour around the globe for several weeks, killing almost all life. Attempts to destroy it were ineffective because the outer hull of the rocket existed partially in another dimension so an A-bomb exploded against it had no effect. And so forth.  Needless to say, in all of these works, the fictional earthlings were caught by surprise at the nature of the alien weaponry, and so it would be in real life.

2.      2. WILL NOT BE KINETIC
Our wars are now mainly kinetic, meaning they depend largely on kinetic energy weapons, such as exploding bombs and high velocity projectiles. Sure, other forms of weapons exist also, such as biological (diseases), and chemical (gas), and we really hate it when other countries use them. Aliens might use not only these types of weapons, but they also could use far out things as well. For example, they could project powerful telepathic commands to the humans, or deploy their antigravity technology to crush and destroy.  In the movie, “The Arrival”, they used weather wrecking apparatus to heat up the world more to their liking. Of course, we will attempt to make our resistance as kinetic as possible, but the aliens will not. As far as I know, there has never been a case where a UFO is seen dropping a bomb or firing a projectile. They only are known to use fields and rays, so that is what I expect their weapons to be based on.  It is known that they do have heat rays, and that is very kinetic, but I am restricting my definition of kinetic weapons to be explosives and projectiles.

 3.  WILL NOT OBEY THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS
 Civilians will be treated about the same as military.  After all, when we steal honey from a hive, we do not distinguish between their soldier bees and any other bees.

4.       4. WILL NOT BE THERMONUCLEAR
There are many true reports reaching back decades (and still continuing) of UFOs hovering around our nuclear plants, military nuclear powered ships, and military and missile bases where nuclear weapons are stored. They are quite interested in our nuclear items, but that does not mean that they would use weapons of nuclear fusion or fission. Throughout their short public history here, their focus has been on the planet, its fauna and flora, and when discussing the grays, ourselves. They will not use weapons which scar and pollute this place, or so I believe. Their past behavior as gleaned from Close Encounters of the Third Kind show no tendency to destroy this place. There is even a report that a UFO aimed a ray at the newly destroyed Chernobyl reactor and lessened its radiation by a significant percentage.  I do not know how true that report is, but that, plus the CE3 report history, plus the fact that only a few UFO reports mention atomic radiation leads me to believe that the thermonuclear scenario is not going to happen.

5.      5.  WOULD CAUSE US TO FINALLY DEPLOY OUR SECRET WEAPONS
At long last, if no other alternatives are available for us, the USA would finally deploy its weapons based on ET captured technology. Our own black triangles, our directed energy weapons from our Star Wars program, and our weaponized space installations would be brought into action. Our secret underground bases would become less secret as more and more use is made of them.  Even during an alien war, the USA would still try to keep this stuff under wraps as much as possible because they know repercussions would occur if the war ever ended favorably.

6.       6. MAY NOT EVEN BE NOTICEABLE
Did you ever consider that we may be in a war with aliens right now? Why do our jets chase them?  Is the abduction program evidence of a slow, long term attempt at takeover by infiltration? Infiltration aimed at takeover is a slow war. Abductions are now into their 6th decade or so. Would we even notice an alien takeover program that lasts 60 years? 600 years? It would be especially hard to notice because both our government and the aliens themselves do not want us to notice anything out of the ordinary.

7.       7. WILL NOT HAVE A CYBER COMPONENT
There are almost 200 countries on this planet, and “over twenty nations’ militaries and intelligence services have created offensive cyber war units …” according to authors Clarke and Knake in their book, “Cyber War”, c2010. Cyber warfare capability is now a very big deal in military strategy and intelligence gathering these days.  These 20 countries include the biggest and most powerful nations in the world plus some rogue nations. The problem for these cyber departments in an alien war is simply what would they connect to? There appears to be nothing. The best form of cyber war defense is to disconnect from the internet. Conversely, if we cannot connect to the alien computer system at all, then our cyber expertise will be useless against them. In the movie, “Independence Day”, cyber war was used to upload a virus into the alien mothership.  I think that this is pretty far fetched, and that it is safe to say that during an alien war, these cyber departments would not have anything to do directly against the aliens. There is also another reason that I say this which will be addressed in number 9 following.

One last item of interest regarding cyber war against aliens might be that in an entirely telepathic culture as many aliens are thought to be from, there probably would not be any beings who would purposely put viruses onto their computer network as there are in our human culture. That is because telepathy would reveal their guilt pretty quickly. Therefore, if their network were available to our human hackers, it might be completely wide open to implantation of human computer viruses.

8.      8. WILL REVEAL TACTICS BORNE OF AN OVERWHELMING ESPIONAGE ADVANTAGE FOR THE ALIENS
The history of UFOs snooping around military installations has already been mentioned. The amazing thing about this is that the aliens appear to have the capability to analyze what is secretly stored at these bases. They have the capability to detect, activate, or control items that are behind solid, closed, opaque barriers. You may recall the UFO at Rendlesham forest in the UK in 1980. It was not publicly revealed until well after the incident that this base was storing nuclear weapons. Apparently the aliens knew what the public did not. Now add to this the persistent stories about human looking aliens among us, some of whom are naturally human appearing and others who may be alien hybrids created by the abduction program who are bred to be human appearing, and who probably have 99+% human DNA after several generational cycles of breeding. These “people” will have espionage on their agenda, for sure, if there is to be an alien conflict. Now take a look at our own infiltration of the aliens. There isn’t any. We cannot plant a human spy into their ranks. They have telepathy which would reveal our spy even if we could find someone who could act and speak the part. It would have to be a turncoat alien, and I bet we have none of those. When we do catch a live alien, we pump it for all it’s worth trying to extract information. That’s not really espionage even though it is bonafide intelligence gathering. I also doubt very highly that we can insert data into their communication stream (if we even have found any such streams) or even interpret their data streams so as to snoop, deter, and disrupt like hackers do.

The main espionage that we may have to use against aliens is our remote viewing program, allegedly cancelled by our CIA in 1995, but it is undoubtedly still in use if and only if it was deemed effective. And yes, it probably was deemed effective because the CIA kept it for 20 years before they cancelled it. Also, our remote viewers kept bumping into UFOs and aliens while they worked, and this was irritating and a distraction. Why did they cancel remote viewing? Because it leaked, so they had to avoid embarrassment while it was taken further into blackness.

9.      9. MAY NOT HAVE ANY CONFLICT
How could a war not have any conflict? By this I mean a large amount of physical conflict. Here is my opinion on the likelihood of physical conflict in an alien war. In the scifi book, “The Alien Years” by Robert Silverberg, he relates how beings come to earth and conquer the planet by simply stopping the operation of electricity, and that includes battery stoppage. The result was that there was no meaningful resistance whatsoever against the invasion. We know that UFOs are strongly associated with stoppage of electricity, plus there are many stories of UFOs having been observed before electrical power grid failure.  We know that humans can stop electricity too, albeit crudely, through the use of electromagnetic pulses (EMP). My opinion regarding electricity stoppage is that it is a natural outgrowth of being near the fields generated by the craft’s propulsion system, and that it is NOT a deliberate goal imposed by the aliens on our electrical grid and machinery. UFOs also appear to have the capability to suck power from our power grid. These field effects from the UFOs are not weapons; however, they certainly could be weaponized by them and maybe already have been. Another example of a war-stopper secret weapon could be a biological weapon like a virus that attacks and kills humans in just a few hours.  But here is the main point of this section: aliens might have a weapon so universal, so thorough, so quick, and so dominant,  that in just a few hours after its deployment there would be no opposition at all. And that is what I think will be most likely.


I have used a lot of movies and books to illustrate some of my points. I had to do this because I know of no UFO books that do. A few of the other invasion/takeover movies that I did not use in this writeup are ”Invasion of the Bodysnatchers”,  “War of the Worlds”, “Plan 9 from Outer  Space” (thought by some to be the worst movie ever made), "Transformers”, and “Skyline.” I could go on. Of recent movies, the one that violates most of the points in this writeup is “Battle: LA”. It was horrible, packed with clichés, and simply showed an alien force using conventional earth tactics such as a command and control center which was controlling an alien infantry and aircraft, all shooting projectile weapons. One could just as well have substituted a human invasion force doing pretty much the same things as the aliens. It also mentioned that they are here to steal our liquid water, when everyone knows that there is plenty of frozen water in outer space.  No originality whatsoever.


* I thought it would be interesting to include the following footnote although it has nothing to do with aliens. This book, Cyber War, released in April, 2010, states that bin Laden is hiding in a villa and not a cave. I presume that if it were released in 2010, then it may have been written in 2009. Furthermore, Christiane Amanpour on October 3, 2008, stated that bin Laden was hiding in a villa in Pakistan. A YouTube video of this is at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-ySteY3r9I. Here are two serious public figures whose careers depend on their credibility making these declarative statements.  It makes one wonder.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

SATELLITES AND THE VIRTUAL PANOPTICON GOVERNMENT
by Ufonalyzer October, 2009; Re-published 12/24/13

12/24/13: I wrote this over 4 years ago. Due to the recent revelations supplied by Edward Snowden, it has become relevant to our present status here in the USA. This article's emphasis on the use of satellites and its downplay of the use of drones is probably incorrect, but the statements about government surveillance are 100% accurate. Here it is again for your reading pleasure, unedited.

As of the year 2000 about 8000 satellites had been launched since the 1957 beginning of the space age. About 560 were still up there operating as of that year [1] and now (as of 10/01/09) there are 900 operating [2]. What happened to the thousands of missing satellites? They went dead, became so obsolete as to become not used anymore, or fell back to earth.

Satellites can be categorized into many different groups, depending on what you may wish to discuss. They can be categorized by orbit (Low Earth Orbit, Medium Earth Orbit, Elliptical, Geosynchronous (includes Geostationary)); by controlling organization (military, civil, commercial, government); or by function (imaging {includes spy}, scientific, communications). Groups of satellites that fulfill a particular function are called constellations. Therefore, they can also be categorized by constellation name (e.g. GPS, Iridium, Globalstar). Of the 900, the US has 435 operating satellites of which 111 are military. The Defense Support Program (DSP) satellites are military. Russia has 90 and China has 53 total satellites in operation now [2].

Some satellites may be so secret that they have not even been found yet. There are many launch facilities around the world from which a secret satellite could be sent into space. Furthermore, multiple satellites can be deployed into space from the same launch. Satellites can also be launched from a missile attached to a flying airplane. The original proposal for the Iridium system of global portable phones recommended this as the favored launch method to keep costs in control. If America were to have a secret space fleet, satellites could be launched from our spaceships. After all, they already have been launched from the space shuttle. Thus, monitoring of the US’s favorite launch facilities would do no good to determine if another satellite were to join the 900.

It is very likely that the 111 US military satellite quantity is understated. There is an organization of hobbyists who track satellites which in 2006 was tracking about 140 black American satellites [3]. At about this time, the website for the Union of Concerned Scientists [2] stated that there were 95 US military satellites. Thus we must conclude that we have extra satellites up there doing things that we haven’t a clue about.

Many of the military satellites are up there for spying purposes. The most publicized of the spy satellites are the KH satellites, nicknamed KeyHole, which have been evolving steadily for decades. The original Keyhole satellites launched in 1960 had 3 foot resolution, in 1990 they were rumored to have 6” resolution, and the current KH-12 series launched from 1995 to 2005 is rumored to have 2 cm resolution. Just consider this: in 35 years the resolution of the Keyhole series went from 36 inches to 0.8 inches. It would be a good bet to believe that now in 2009 resolution is good enough to read license plates and do facial recognition by satellite. We may even have satellites that can read an open book from 400 miles! We will come back to this later.

Of course, more types of spying than just visual and infrared imaging are being done from these satellites. In 1999, cellular switch (the stationary piece of a cellular telephone system that the handheld cellphones “talk to”) manufacturers were mandated by the government to provide “hooks”, i.e. access capability, of both hardware and software as necessary to allow easy phone call monitoring of cellular conversations in the next generation of switch designs. This was before 9/11/2001. It would be naïve to assume that communications satellites were not similarly mandated, even though these satellites, like cellular switches, are commercially owned.

In this day and age, a country has to have spy capability to maintain control of the radical elements of the world who wish to destroy whatever democracy we have left. The law allows monitoring of phone calls when one end of the call is outside the US. The problem is that it is just as easy to monitor any call, not just the ones with a foreign termination, using existing technology. Thus, the government is prevented from listening in on US to US conversations by using a “Chinese firewall” to avoid breaking the law. (A Chinese firewall is a protocol only barrier; only written rules prevent breaching it. Any unethical person who wishes to breach the firewall to find something out or do something wrong can do so because the barrier is set up only by rules and ethics.) Past history has proven that the government just cannot resist the temptation to spy on its citizens if it has the physical and technical means to do so. It never has and never will obey the Chinese firewall, and that is a problem. Now consider the use of spy satellites. Now that we have satellites that can really zero in on a person, is there a protocol where use of such imaging satellites is permitted only for foreign spying? How long will it take for visual satellite spying on US cititzens to start to occur? Just something to consider. {Digression: 4 star general Michael Hayden was the director of the NSA and later was appointed by Bush to become the Director of the CIA. This lasted until Obama replaced him. This is the same Michael Hayden who vigorously defended the use of secret prisons and questionable interrogation methods on suspected terrorists. This is the same Michael Hayden who as director of NSA, his job prior to the CIA directorship, said in a national press conference on May 31, 2006, that he was 100% sure that the 4th Amendment did not have a prohibition against searches and seizures without probable cause. NSA’s main job is to eavesdrop on communications and it illegally does this on American to American communications all the time which it denies. It is unforgiveable that the head of an eavesdropping organization like the NSA would not know that “upon probable cause” is literally part of the 4th amendment. It was a disgusting and disgraceful display of ignorance and arrogance. He should have been fired soon after this revelation. Instead Bush appoints him to a more prestigious position about a year later, the Directorship of the CIA. Unbelievable! Why was this guy a 4 star general? Why was he rewarded with high positions? Yikes!}

It is the Ufonalyzer’s belief that our satellite technology contributed greatly to the success of the “surge” in Iraq. Bob Woodward, in his book “The War Within”, writes the following long passage:
“Beginning in about May 2006, the U.S. military and the U.S. intelligence agencies launched a series of TOP SECRET operations that enabled them to locate, target, and kill key individuals in extremist groups such as al Qaeda, the Sunni insurgency and renegade Shia militias, or so-called special groups. The operations, which were either Special Access Programs (SAP) or part of Special Compartmented Information (SCI), incorporated some of the most highly classified techniques and information in the U.S. government.
Senior military officers and officials at the White House have asked me not to publish the details or the code word names associated with these groundbreaking programs. They argue that publication of the names alone might lead to unraveling of state secrets that have been so beneficial in Iraq. Because disclosing the details of such operations could compromise their ongoing use, I have chosen not to include more here. But a number of authoritative sources say these covert activities had a far-reaching effect on the violence and were very possibly the biggest factor in reducing it. Several said that 85 to 90 percent of the successful operations and “actionable intelligence” had come from these new sources, methods, and operations. Several others said that figure was exaggerated but acknowledged their significance. Once again, it was American innovation that provided and edge.”
 [4] Bold type added by this writer for emphasis.

What this says is that the troop increase in Iraq known as the surge was not wholly responsible for the turn around in that conflict. In fact, some people thought that it may have contributed only a small portion of the improvement. Now there is talk of doing the surge again, this time in Afghanistan so these secret programs would be reused if there is an Afghan surge. What were these secret programs that Mr. Woodward is referring to in this passage that were so effective? For sure, one of the the secret programs was the hiring of Blackwater by the CIA to conduct assassinations as reported August 19, 2009, in the New York Times. {Digression: Ironically, at this same moment in time, the CIA’s website states the following in its FAQ section:
“FAQ #9: The CIA has been accused of conducting assassinations and engaging in drug trafficking. What are the facts?
Answer: The CIA does neither. Executive order 12333 of 1981 explicitly prohibits the CIA from engaging, either directly or indirectly, in assassinations. Internal safeguards and the congressional oversight process assure compliance.” 
[5]} The font size and bold emphasis are the Ufonalyzer’s.

This is on the CIA website even as they admitted hiring Blackwater to perform assassinations. So much for the truth from the CIA. The Ufonalyzer is not against assassinating fanatical terrorists. He is against secrecy and lies.}

Woodward’s book implies that a combination of techniques was used as effective countermeasures against Al Qaeda. It mentions Special Access Programs which are almost always Black Budget highly technical developments. The hiring of assassins is NOT a highly technical development. They do the killing, but what did the locating and targeting? It is therefore highly likely that spy satellites were instrumental in locating and recognizing the targets to be assassinated. Drones could have been used also, but satellites would give far more coverage. This means that we know how to use these satellites against individual people and not just stationary targets.

Now, let’s take this one step further. In 1967, the Outer Space Treaty prohibited the deployment of weapons of mass destruction in space. Most people believe that there currently are no weapons in space, but this treaty did NOT forbid the deployment of conventional weapons. But what do you think would be the “jewel in the crown” of a future satellite weapon system? The Ufonalyzer believes that it would be a satellite which could be programmed with facial recognition software and which can assassinate a person from space with precision. It would be a sniper satellite. If that existed, there would be little need to hire a Blackwater or Wackenhut to do the job.

A totalitarian society with this kind of capability is a chilling thought. Now there are many countries where the state is supreme; it disallows any criticism of itself whatsoever, and freely uses torture and assassination of its own citizens to achieve its ends. Weapons like a laser assassination satellite would be a welcome addition to control the masses. The populace could become very paranoid, knowing that they could be struck down at any moment. Fashions might change where hats and facial hair become the norm, and glassene clothing to reflect away laser beams could be introduced.

In 1791, Jeremy Bentham conceived of a type of architecture which would allow a single person to watch over everyone else in the building. This concept would be of use in, say, a prison or a library. This type of architectural design is called a Panopticon. Everyone within it would realize they could be watched at any conceivable moment, and as a result would behave according to the rules. A totalitarian government would like to have a virtual panopticon, where any person knows that he/she is watchable and recordable into a monitored, central databank. Everyone in their country would realize that they had no privacy, and were subject to computerized eavesdropping of their phones and internet work by centralized supercomputers, and their outdoor activities via spy satellite. If they misbehaved, they could be taken out at any time on the street by a laser beam from above. What a horrible place that would be. To compensate, the government would have to supply “bread and circuses” as the Romans used to say. Free or cheap food and mindless entertainment would be served up as an opiate for the masses. This kind of society is within reach today—that’s the scary part. Elements of it are already in place, awaiting the tyrannical leader who will put it all together.

Fortunately, with regard to satellites being used as offensive weapons, there are some big drawbacks. Most satellite types these days are detectable mainly because their sightings are repeatable due to being in regular orbits. They are also easily detectable by radar. The US’s SPASUR system has been very effective in detecting satellites going over the US. Repetitive orbits allow predictive analysis on where they will be in the future. This makes them vulnerable. Both the US and China each have shot down one of their own defective satellites from the ground. They are not the ultimate weapon. A space fleet would not have the weaknesses of a satellite weapon. We know UFOs have cloaking capability, so it is likely our scientists are working on that too. If they are successful, all sorts of things will be given this capability, satellites among them. Until then, we must assume that space satellites remain easily detectable and therefore vulnerable. Please read Unfonalyzer’s writeup, “Does America Have a Secret Space Program?” to find out more about this possibility.

[1] http://www.aiaa.org/Aerospace/Article.cfm?issuetocid=122&ArchiveIssueID=17
[2]http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_global_security/space_weapons/technical_issues/ucs-satellite-database.html
[3] http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.02/spy.html
[4] “The War Within” by Bob Woodward, 2008, page 380
[5] https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/faqs/index.html

Thursday, July 25, 2013

ALIEN TELEPATHY AND WILBERT SMITH by Charles Tromblee

ALIEN TELEPATHY AND WILBERT SMITH
By Charles Tromblee    July, 2013

In 2009 I did research on alien sightings. One of the important things that I neglected to quantify in that research was the frequency of telepathy among the dozens of alien races that have visited earth; instead I recorded information about other characteristics, including such unimportant items such as clothing. The only times when alien clothing is interesting are when helmets are worn versus not worn or when an alien is naked, and the latter never happens. Otherwise, the usual alien garb is a one piece jumpsuit. Fortunately, Malaysian UFO & alien researcher Ahmad Jamaludin [1] took data on alien telepathy from the same data source that I used, which is the excellent work of Albert Rosales[2]. Over a span of years from 1946 through 2005, Mr. Jamaludin discovered that when an alien communicated with a human, telepathy was the means of communication in 654 of 1268 instances  (51%.) The other lesser used methods of communication were translating devices, spoke local language, use of sign language, or spoke an unintelligible language [3]. Please realize that Mr. Jamaludin did not do any pre-filtering of his data to prevent many obvious nut job reports (i.e. reports from “impaired” people) from corrupting his data. 

The intent of this article is to revisit one aspect of a previous article in this blog, “Two Wilbert Smith Stories”, published in April, 2013. It was quite disappointing to witness how few people read that article because it contained a couple of very significant implications. The main implication was that for sure the USA has other means to detect UFOs than just radar. We seem to be fixated on visual evidence augmented by radar (and to a much, much lesser extent, infrared), and do not consider that other means to detect UFOs may be possible. In fact, it is well known that UFOs can evade both visual and radar with their cloaking technology so it would be great if a new method to detect UFOs were discovered.  Mr. Smith demonstrated in 1954 that airplanes and UFOs could be detected with gravimeters because their mass distorted gravity. It is very doubtful that alien technology could cloak the gravitational anomalies created by the mass of their machines. This could explain why the US military is “Johnny-on-the-spot” when it comes to quickly arriving at a fresh landing site, crash, large UFO hanging around in the sky, etc.

The other significant implication is more indirect, and to explain my point, I will have to get a bit personal about myself. First of all, let us state something obvious about telepathy. If a species is telepathic, it is quite obvious that the whole field of teaching and education would be revolutionized for that species from what it would have been had that species been non-telepathic. Education would proceed much more quickly and greater depths of understanding would be achieved.

As you may know, Wilbert Smith claimed to be the benefactor of such telepathic education from an unseen alien source. In his famous 1950 memo in which he stated that US scientists claimed that UFOs were more secret than the H-Bomb [4], he also mentions that these machines were possibly associated with mental phenomena [5].  Mr. Smith started his scientific studies of UFOs by attempting to verify his hypothesis that the UFO propulsion system was based on tapping into earth’s magnetic field. In just a few short years, it is apparent that he had abandoned that dead end study and started doing experiments on gravity. The brief description of his gravitation experimental lab setup showed that it was remarkably like Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov’s widely known 1991 gravity experimental setup. (You can see Podkletnov talk about his setup on YouTube.) To what can we attribute this rapid rise of understanding of the mysterious force of gravity?

Here is what I find to be remarkable about Mr. Smith. Mr. Wilbert B. Smith had a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of (British) Columbia as his highest degree. He worked in radio engineering after that. I have a master’s degree in electrical engineering from a large university, and I worked in radio engineering after that. I know something about electrical engineering curricula, and am of the opinion that Mr. Smith’s courses were probably less sophisticated than mine were, as he had obtained his master’s degree perhaps 30 years before I did. Of course, Mr. Smith probably achieved straight A’s which I did not, and it is obvious that he was much more intelligent. Even with this concession, I do not see how there is any chance that he was educationally or occupationally prepared to do the experiments in advanced physics that he was doing. He was using knowledge that he just should not have had!  (This is beginning to sound like those literature pundits who insist that Shakespeare could not have written his literary works of genius.) Where did this knowledge come from? Well, the most likely answer is that with his apparent high innate intelligence, he had various mental breakthroughs in his new fields of interest. Several successive light bulbs must have gone off in his head which propelled him toward some of his daring work in physical science, and he mistakenly attributed these new understandings to an outside source (aliens) when really they came from within his own mind. At least that is what I tell myself, contrary to what he openly told everyone which is that aliens sent him this knowledge.  This alien-sent knowledge is available in the book, The New Science c1964 [6], which was “assembled by W. B. Smith from data obtained from beings more advanced than we are” [7]. Wilbert Smith died in 1962 at age 52. In 1964, Murl Smith assembled and copyrighted the book’s material posthumously.

There is always the possibility that Mr. Smith did indeed obtain his advanced physics education through alien telepathy. The work of Budd Hopkins and David Jacobs suggests that the strength of alien telepathy can be technologically amplified so that people can be affected at a distance; i.e. some abductees’ memories cease while the UFO is still in the sky, so close distance would not be a requirement  for telepathic “education.”  To educate Mr. Smith, an alien would have to have some sort of coupler to detect its thoughts which would then be amplified and transmitted to a human target with a telepathic directional antenna. This is not so far-fetched given our own human experiments in thought control of various items. Examples brain-to-machine interfaces can be found on YouTube.

Mr. Smith appears to have been an open and guileless individual. He cared not one iota for secrecy. If he said he obtained knowledge telepathically from aliens, he certainly believed it.

[1]Data from 60 Years of Neglected Evidence: Analysis of Global Humanoid Encounter Reports by Ahmad Jamaludin, c 2011

[2]Mr. Rosales’ website is at

[3]Here is a lengthy breakdown of that data, by year:


ALIEN-HUMAN ENCOUNTERS IN WHICH COMMUNICATION OCCURRED
year
telepathic encounters
total encounters
percent telepathic




1946
1
4
25
47
3
10
30
48
6
9
67
49
0
1
0
1950
7
16
44
51
1
7
14
52
3
15
20
53
8
14
57
54
5
36
14
55
3
12
25
56
10
15
67
57
8
23
35
58
7
21
33
59
4
9
44
1960
4
8
50
61
7
13
54
62
6
15
40
63
2
11
18
64
6
15
40
65
14
                   30
47
66
10
20
50
67
20
46
43
68
12
30
40
69
9
22
41
1970
10
17
59
71
14
18
78
72
11
20
55
73
10
21
48
74
17
30
57
75
22
31
71
76
21
38
55
77
16
29
55
78
26
58
45
79
14
32
44
1980
21
33
64
81
8
14
57
82
15
23
65
83
9
18
50
84
14
22
64
85
8
14
57
86
9
19
47
87
3
9
33
88
12
19
63
89
34
61
56
1990
46
90
51
91
26
42
62
92
13
18
72
93
10
11
91
94
13
16
81
95
12
22
55
96
14
23
61
97
17
25
68
98
5
12
42
99
7
17
41
2000
12
19
63
1
8
16
50
2
3
9
33
3
5
9
56
4
5
19
26
                                        2005
                              8
                             12
                          67
TOTAL
654
1268
51















































[4]Exact quote from memo: “The matter is the most highly classified subject in the UnitedStates
Government, rating higher even than the H-bomb.”

[5]Exact quote from memo, italics added: “I was further informed that the United States authorities are 
investigating along quite a number of lines which might possibly be related to the saucers such as 
mental phenomena…”

[6]Available for free on the internet at

[7]Quote from the introduction of The New Science