UFO CRASHING VIDEO by Ufonalyzer 12/09

UFO CRASHING VIDEO by Ufonalyzer 12/09

There is a short video that has been around for at least 4 to 5 years or more of a UFO crashing. It can be found at

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4987931999759537743#

and other internet locations as well. It is titled “UFO Crash”, but it does not seem to generating any buzz in spite of its clear portrayal of the event. The ufonalyzer has read a short sentence or two about the video in a couple of spots on the internet and these claim that it is a 1997 test missile crash at White Sands, NM. This storyline is probably misinformation to reduce the impact of what is being seen right before our very eyes. This video has never been portrayed as being a hoax, nor does it look like one. The problem with this video, then, is of how it is being protrayed, and NOT whether it has been faked. So it is either a UFO or a man made object crashing, and it really is probably crashing at White Sands.

Why is it a real UFO?

1. It appears to be a discoid shape, but a cylindrical missile could provide a side view that could possibly appear like this does in the video.
2. At the very beginning of the video, the object is plummeting to the earth at about a 45 degree angle, and then it tries to come out of its dive such that by the time first impact is made with the ground it hits at about a 30 degree angle. Thus it is retaining some type of flight capability until the last second and it is under some sort of control. To effect the change in its fall, its propulsion system must be providing power to make a sharp turn. If it were a missile, one could see the rocket exhaust as the engines are firing and there is no evidence of that. A UFO uses field propulsion whose only known indications of a high power turn on are as follows:
a. UFOs often exhibit an increase in self luminosity because they apparently ionize the air around them as they “power up.” This object is obviously pretty brightly self luminous.
b. Many videos of UFOs show visual distortion around the object, particularly at the bottom. This video shows this too, so that the thing looks a lot like a jellyfish with dangling tentacles, the tentacles being the distortion of the antigravity field in full operation. The Ufonalyzer saw this only when he went to look for it on full screen.
3. It is obviously self luminous. Missiles are not. Now, one could say that this aircraft is malfunctioning and is glowing due to heat perhaps caused by high speed. The speed of this UFO is pretty low. The video shows 3 telephone poles in the foreground being passed during the crash sequence (a 4th pole is estimated in the sequence.) They appear to be about 4 times closer to the camera than the UFO is. Standard AT&T telephone pole spacing practice in rural areas is 132 feet, so if the UFO is 4 times further away than the poles, it horizontally traverses 2100 feet in the 14 seconds until second impact. This is only 150 mph. Given the gross estimates being made, the speed could easily be twice as high, or even slower. Obviously its speed has been reduced at first impact and as it seeks to come out of its dive, but for sure this object is NOT glowing due atmospheric friction due to its slowness.
4. The bounce after first impact of the object is very impressive and indicative of high structural strength. What little is known of UFO crashes shows that it takes a lot of abuse to fragmentize a UFO.

Now, one may ask if this is UFO, then why didn’t it use its “instantaneous” turn, start, stop capability to come out of the crash? The Ufonalyzer’s response to this is that it is disabled due to some malfunction or to having been shot which is why it is crashing in the first place.

White Sands has a long UFO history, predating even the Roswell event. This UFO may have been snooping around and could have been shot down. Taken in their collective entirety, it is hoped that these observations make a convincing case that this video really is of a crashing UFO.

©