ALIEN CONFLICT by Ufonalzyer 1/2010
In a couple of the Ufonalzer’s other writeups, he provides evidence that logically suggests the existence of a Galactic Federation. An organization such as a Federation obviously has members, and they participate in whatever advantages such membership provides. They are the insiders. The theory that a Federation exists also implies that there would be planets who are not members. So there probably are insiders and outsiders in whatever region of space the Federation occupies. Outsiders can be in in physical conflict with the Federation members.
Stories can be found in ufology that describe alien conflict. Some of these stories are several hundred years old. We have all seen UFO specials on TV which invariably mention the conflicts of 1561 above Nuremberg, Germany and 1566 above Basel, Switzerland. The Ufonalyzer just learned of another very old story which describes an aerial battle related by Jesuit missionary Alonso Ovalle, 1603-1651, in his “Historica Relacion del Reino de Chile” 1646. This account is now reproduced in a new book by Juan Guillermo Prado and Luis Altamirano, entitled, “Historia de la Ufologia en Chile”. The battle occurred near Villarica volcano.These books are on order through the local Inter Library Loan system, so if one of them is obtained (which is doubtful), this article will be updated with a description of that ancient event. Then, too, are the very old battles described in India’s Ramayana and Mahabarata. One can only wonder if these aliens in conflict are fighting over some old grudge or are fighting over earth. Given that just about everything has changed radically on earth in the last 500 years since these fights were first witnessed, the nod has to be given to this being an old war that has nothing to do with us, unless they happen to be fighting over some natural resource that earth has that they all want.
But this writeup intends to deal with more current evidence of the continuing hostilities because evidence says that they are continuing. The Ufonalyzer will merely act as a collector and disseminator of these accounts of conflict. He has made bold and italicized the sentences which describe the conflict of the different races.
1. From Linda Moulton Howe’s website, “Earthfiles”: January 3, 2010, Albuquerque, New Mexico - -Continuation of LMH's May 8, 1997, interview with Edward Leverne Moragne, Ph.D., at his Houston, Texas, home: LMH: “Do you think there is any evidence of warring planets, or some kind of extraterrestrial conflict? Did anyone at EdwardsAFB talk about that? Dr. Moragne: “Not from Edwards, but I met a man who seemed to know a lot about three different planets at war with each other and non-humans that use some kind of powerful weapons. But I don't know any details.” .....
------------------------------------------------
2. From Linda Moulton Howe’s website, “Earthfiles”: May 20, 2008, “High Strangeness in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, by Lake Okanagan” town: Kelowna, British Columbia, July 2, 2007:
Only one year ago on Monday, July 2, 2007, around 10:45 to 11 PM, several eyewitnesses from the Kelowna to Winfield region of Lake Okanagan saw differently shaped aerial craft, which seemed to be at war with each other. One July 2nd, Kelowna eyewitness reported that around 10:45 PM, “I saw two objects in the sky just hovering. One craft was thin and long. The other was triangular in shape. They kept hovering there so I got up quickly to run and grab my camera. But the next thing I know before I take any photos, I hear a small bang, almost like a gunshot. The long object begins to hurtle towards earth on fire, making a deep bass sound like a nuclear generator. And I’m thinking to myself, ‘What the hell?!’
“I watched the falling object and it disappeared at low altitude behind a small hill between my neighborhood and the lake. I look up and see the triangular object make a small circle in the sky and then come a little lower and then I see it start to hurtle towards the sky at a fast rate.
“Then the long thing reappears from behind the hill. It’s no longer on fire and it’s ascending at breakneck speed and it gets higher going after the triangle-shaped object. I see the long thing literally shoot something at the triangle object and then a very loud bang and then the triangular craft was no longer visible. The long thing started to search the sky. It was going north, the south, then east and west – very quickly, almost like a hummingbird when it goes side-to-side.
“Then the object disappeared and I suppose its departure broke the sound barrier because immediately I heard that sonic boom when the sound barrier is broken. After my many years of watching the skies, I finally saw what seemed like two E. T.s duking it out.”
Fifteen minutes later at 11 PM, another eyewitness of warring UFOs in Westbank near Kelowna also saw a flaming object splash into Lake Okanagan and from there, rose back out of the water chasing after another aerial object in the sky. It is assumed that the eyewitnesses were watching the same astounding event, but estimated the two different times of 10:45 and 11 PM.
A woman walking her dog said that it looked like a “torpedo on fire crashed into the lake and created a big splash of water.” She also heard a loud, base “womp, womp, womp” sound as the fiery torpedo came down. That woman emailed Brian Vike of Houston, British Columbia UFO Research and she wrote: “I don’t know what happened last night, but it was the most frightening, incredible and down right terrifying thing I have ever seen.” She described the fiery torpedo - that the other person called “long” – falling into the lake and then explained, “it, or something, came literally shooting back out of the water and I saw it hurtle towards a different-looking object very high in the sky.” The woman said the higher object she saw looked cone-shaped. In her email, she wrote: “I saw what looked like you see in a Star Wars movie and they have bullets or lasers that are kind of blasting out of things (that were) coming from that torpedo-object that was in the lake and I heard a loud bang that knocked me off my feet. I looked up to see what the heck was going on and the cone-shaped object was gone and the torpedo-shaped craft was just hovering, moving from side-to-side, almost like it was confused. Then there was a loud sonic boom and it was gone.”…..
-----------------------------------
3. From Albert Rosales’ website, “Humanoid Sighting Reports,” Case #79 Location--Near Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil Date: August 2003, Time: night:
Andre Villa and his girlfriend had camped out on a hill overlooking a valley and had started a small bonfire when they noticed a bright bluish light descend over the area, within the light they could see a large disc-shaped craft. The illuminated craft approached their position at very high speed and landed on a nearby field. Terrified both witnesses ran and hid behind some bushes, the whole time keeping their eyes on the object. They could see that the craft was really hovering at about 3 meters from the ground, illuminating its surroundings like daytime. The craft did not have windows, doors or openings; it was completely smooth and was encased in a bright bluish glow. Despite his girlfriend's loud objections Andres approached to within 200 meters of the craft and hid behind a pile of rocks near the bonfire in order to obtain a better look at the strange craft. After about 20 minutes an opening became visible on the craft that still floated close to the ground, from the opening a small ladder-like protrusion dropped to the ground. Two short humanoid creatures then climbed down to the ground from inside the object, these had child-like bodies, very pale features, huge heads, but the witnesses could not see their facial features due to the glaring blue light around the craft. The two humanoids looked around and seemed to talk among themselves, soon 3 more similar creatures emerged from the craft. The group walked around the area near the object as if looking for something. Moments later the witness watched another bright light descending from the sky. The light hovered briefly changing colors from red to orange tones. Suddenly the short humanoids that had been milling around the bluish disc-shaped craft appeared to become agitated and began running towards their craft, while the other craft, a sphere shaped object dotted with bright beams of light quickly descended over the scene. The sphere descended to within 50 meters of the disc and landed. The witnesses then heard a loud roaring noise and a bright flash from the sphere temporarily blinded and seemed to incapacitate several of the short humanoids, since a couple dropped to the ground. The glare now gone the witnesses saw three figures come out of the sphere. These were described as taller, human-like, wearing transparent glass-like helmets, and very tight-fitting black jumpsuits. These aliens ran in the direction of the shorter humanoids, which were still stunned and appeared confused. Three of the short humanoids managed to enter their craft, but two were unable to and remained behind to confront the other three apparently threatening aliens. The stunned witnesses watched as a brief but violent struggle ensued. To their horror they watched as the two short humanoids were apparently struck down by the taller aliens, while their bluish disc-shaped craft pulled up the ladder, closed the opening and shot away at incredible speed, living behind their two fallen comrades. The three tall aliens then proceeded to pick up the limp bodies of the short humanoids and dragged them inside their sphere-shaped craft. The witnesses could not tell if the humanoids were dead or still alive. The aliens quickly entered the sphere, which then rose up into the sky and vanished in plain sight. Terrified the two witnesses left the area, promising never to return to the area.
-------------------------------------
4. From “Unearthly Disclosure” by Timothy Good, 2000. Summarized by Ufonalyzer:
Rubens Junqueira Villela , a Brazilian meteorologist and explorer, had multiple contacts over an extended time with aliens through communications with him and through other humans. Based on reading his accounts, he never met any face to face. On the night of 4/21/1996, Villela told T. Good the following story: “We had seen small moving lights(‘sondes’) and two small craft flying together. The ETs said they would give a demonstration of their weapons by shooting down a “rival’s” observation device, hovering in the sky. The object blew up silently, growing from a star-like point to a larger, tear-drop shape. The ETs said it had been disintegrated before it hit the ground so as not to disturb the neighbourhood, and it emitted only a high frequency sound.”
------------------------------------
5. From Albert Rosales’ website, “Humanoid Sighting Reports,” Case # 201 Location. Near Kapustin Yar range, Astrakhan or Volgograd region, Russia Date: August 12 1989, Time: night:
Shot down by another UFO during a dogfight an extraterrestrial disk was damaged by some type of alien beam weapon. The craft lost control and fell at very high speed on a flat terrain outside the State Central Test Range # 4 at Kapustin Yar. The crash was probably noticed by military personnel or reported to them and a retrieval team was sent to the range. UFO observations over Kapustin Yar State Central Test Range # 4 on the night of July 28-29 1989 had caused a stir (confirmed by authentic KGB documents). This was another case and the military was informed about the downed disk-shaped object partially embedded on the ground, in a tilted position. The disk was about 5 to 8 meters in diameter, convexo, shaped like a lens……...
--------------------------------------
6. From www.ufocasebook.com/flyingsaucerbattle.html Location: Russia Date: Sept 16, 1989:
Russian UFO investigator Nikolay Subbotin relates an amazing story of a battle of flying saucers. This incident allegedly took place in the skies of Zaostrovka, in Russia in 1989. On September 16, six circular, silver, flying saucers ganged up and fought a seventh, golden saucer, in full view of the residents of the town and surrounding areas. Hundreds of witnesses watched the gang of six chase the golden saucer out of a cloud bank. All of the saucers made unbelievable maneuvers during this dog fight, and at times, the UFOs flew as low as 5,000 feet. The weapon of choice was a strong beam of light or energy fired at and from the escaping golden UFO. According to the RUFORS Internet newsletter, an account of this event was published in the local newspaper, "Semipalatinsk." According to this report, written by a Russian helicopter commander in the Afghan war, the energy emitted during this battle shut down the local power grid in Zaostrovka, plunging the city into total darkness for a time. The author, named Sichenko, interviewed witnesses of the event, publishing many of their fantastic accounts of the events that day. The witnesses claimed that the outnumbered golden UFO finally was defeated, losing altitude due to the continued hits by the energy beams. The failing saucer at first seemed to be attempting to make a controlled landing, but eventually it lost control, disappearing from view behind a house as it plunged to the ground. The six assaulting saucers soon disappeared from view, heading into the clouds.
Subbotin discovered that the lost saucer had crashed into a bog on a military test rangeThis area was “offflimits" to the general public. It would be about a year before he and accompanying researchers could reach the site of the crash, but by that time, the area was clean, free of any trace of a crashed vehicle. Subbotin would learn that a military team had descended on the boggy area, and conducted a full search and rescue operation. There were reported injuries during this operation. Russian Ufologist Emil Bachurin was able to see medical files which confirmed details of injuries to military personnel involved in the mission. It would be reported that several members of the search and rescue team had leaked information about the operation, but their breach of confidence was discovered, and security was made even tighter.
Also, an airplane attempting to fly over the area and gather details about the crash had to abort its mission because of instrument malfunction.
----------------------------------
7. From Albert Rosales’ website, “Humanoid Sighting Reports,” Case #4 Location--Near Marynsk, border of Amur & Khabarovsk regions, Far East, Russia Date: 1982, Time: unknown:
After a dogfight between UFOs a cylinder-shaped alien spacecraft was shot down in a remote area of taiga (dense northern pine forest) in northeastern Siberia, Evenkian autonomous region of Krasnoyarsk beyond the polar circle. The closest habitable place was the tiny Evenkian village of Murukta. Several months after the crash the UFO was accidentally located from the air. The military was notified. An-12 reconnaissance airplane was dispatched to check and the crew reported seeing a metallic object imbedded into the taiga, reflecting the sun. The military dispatched a special team of experts to the crash site by helicopter and organized a retrieval operation. The crashed object was cylinder shaped approximately 10 meters long and 2.5-3 meters in diameter. The craft was split open by an explosion and separated into two fragments, with lacerated edges. The larger fragment was retrieved. It was burnt and melted from the inside obviously by intense heat of some alien weapon used against it. Very few of its inner structure remained. The craft was metallic silver, having 2 small horizontal protrusions along its hull on the sides on its front part. The recovered fragment was about 5 meters long. As was established, the craft was piloted, but what remained of the crew was only ash and slag. But even those remains of the alien biological payload were intensively studied in governmental Soviet laboratories. The fragment was suspended under a helicopter and most likely moved to the Norilsk aerodrome. The whole operation was under the aegis of Kazakhstan based mobile airborne units of military space forces that had extensive experience and trained for rescue and evacuation of Soviet space vehicles. From Norilsk in order to provide proper secrecy, it was reportedly transported inside a military cargo airplane to Leninsk airbase in the isolated Tura-Tam (Baykonur) NIIP-5 range in Kazakhstan, where it was hidden in an underground bunker. According to the information it is still being kept there in an agreement between Russian and Kazakh governments. The metal alloy and remaining chemical compounds of the craft were studied in several different labs.
-----------------------------------
8. From Albert Rosales’ website, “Humanoid Sighting Reports,” Case #142. Location. Northwest of Kandalaksha, Kola Peninsula, Murmansk region Russia Date: September 1965Time: unknown:
A UFO reportedly crashed in the location. The retrieved fragments were very small particles of melted debris. The craft was totally pulverized, no bodies were found at the site. The craft was apparently shot down by another alien craft. No other information.
©
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Monday, January 18, 2010
ALIEN INSIGNIAS by Ufonalyzer 1/2010
ALIEN INSIGNIAS by Ufonalyzer 1/16/2010
The following spreadsheet was derived using the unfiltered data from Albert Rosales’ website located at: http://www.ufoinfo.com/humanoid/index.shtml
A keyword search was made for the words “emblem” and “insignia” on over 9000 unfiltered thumbnail case descriptions. These 42 hits are what came out plus one more from Linda Moulton Howe's website, "Earthfiles", not including another 10 or so which gave no physical description whatsoever of the insignia.
Why do this at all? Maybe there’s a common insignia which would pop out. Second, using amateur psychology, maybe we can extract another drop of understanding of the situation in the galaxy. This writer is unaware of this ever having been done, so why not give it a try?
One of the first things to notice is that there are only 12 insignias described on the crafts themselves, while the rest are on the aliens’ clothing. If on the craft, the insignia is probably a planetary or local star federation symbol, much like a flag in function. If on the alien body, it could mean the same as on the craft, but additionally it could mean a faction or work group of a planet.
A second thing to notice is that most of the insignias show a stylized, artistic sense never before described in alien sighting literature, but there it is right in front of us, providing of course the sighting is true. Recall that these are unfiltered sightings being used here. There is no sense in trying to decode the abstract meaning of the emblem, because that cannot even be done for emblems used here on earth, so alien emblems would be impossible to figure out what the underlying symbology of the emblem is.
A third thing to consider is this: the emblems show that despite the secrecy that aliens always show to humanity while on their earth missions, there is still a need while on the mission to visually identify themselves. To whom? It has to be other aliens of the same or different species. Therefore, interaction does occur on these missions.
Now let us look at the few very similarly described insignias.
WINGED SNAKE (5 cases)
The most common one is a winged snake. Now why would an alien planet have a snake, or winged animals? Sure it’s possible. We here on earth have lots of ancient cultures that talk about feathered serpents. Ever hear of Quetzalcoatl? Probably a coincidence. Maybe the winged snake is their symbol for us because they are assigned to earth duty. Their craft don’t have wings, but ours do. The cases had little commonality among them, except to say that five occurred in the USA.
CRESCENT MOON (2 cases)
Both were greys, and both were in the USA.
TRIANGLE WITHIN A CIRCLE (2 cases)
These two cases had no commonality.
In conclusion, this study did not reaveal a whole lot about aliens, but it is hoped you found it interesting.
©
The following spreadsheet was derived using the unfiltered data from Albert Rosales’ website located at: http://www.ufoinfo.com/humanoid/index.shtml
A keyword search was made for the words “emblem” and “insignia” on over 9000 unfiltered thumbnail case descriptions. These 42 hits are what came out plus one more from Linda Moulton Howe's website, "Earthfiles", not including another 10 or so which gave no physical description whatsoever of the insignia.
Why do this at all? Maybe there’s a common insignia which would pop out. Second, using amateur psychology, maybe we can extract another drop of understanding of the situation in the galaxy. This writer is unaware of this ever having been done, so why not give it a try?
One of the first things to notice is that there are only 12 insignias described on the crafts themselves, while the rest are on the aliens’ clothing. If on the craft, the insignia is probably a planetary or local star federation symbol, much like a flag in function. If on the alien body, it could mean the same as on the craft, but additionally it could mean a faction or work group of a planet.
A second thing to notice is that most of the insignias show a stylized, artistic sense never before described in alien sighting literature, but there it is right in front of us, providing of course the sighting is true. Recall that these are unfiltered sightings being used here. There is no sense in trying to decode the abstract meaning of the emblem, because that cannot even be done for emblems used here on earth, so alien emblems would be impossible to figure out what the underlying symbology of the emblem is.
A third thing to consider is this: the emblems show that despite the secrecy that aliens always show to humanity while on their earth missions, there is still a need while on the mission to visually identify themselves. To whom? It has to be other aliens of the same or different species. Therefore, interaction does occur on these missions.
Now let us look at the few very similarly described insignias.
WINGED SNAKE (5 cases)
The most common one is a winged snake. Now why would an alien planet have a snake, or winged animals? Sure it’s possible. We here on earth have lots of ancient cultures that talk about feathered serpents. Ever hear of Quetzalcoatl? Probably a coincidence. Maybe the winged snake is their symbol for us because they are assigned to earth duty. Their craft don’t have wings, but ours do. The cases had little commonality among them, except to say that five occurred in the USA.
CRESCENT MOON (2 cases)
Both were greys, and both were in the USA.
TRIANGLE WITHIN A CIRCLE (2 cases)
These two cases had no commonality.
In conclusion, this study did not reaveal a whole lot about aliens, but it is hoped you found it interesting.
©
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
VANISHING UFOs? A PHOENIX LIGHTS UFO? by Ufonalyzer 12/09
Vanishing UFOs? A Phoenix Lights UFO?
By Ufonalzyer 12/2009
Many good visual UFO sightings end when the UFO vanishes. It takes only an instant and suddenly it is gone from view. Consider the following case.
Mr and Mrs X were on their front porch in Chino Valley, Arizona around March, 1997. It was spring, early evening, getting dark, and a clear sky. Their porch faced west. The neighborhood was sparsely settled, with houses every few acres. Suddenly above their house right in front of them a large UFO appeared. It was a huge, oval shape object which suddenly was just there. It was totally silent and its sudden appearance was also silent. It was black in color, but the evening sky still was light enough to allow viewing it as a structured object, but it was too dark out to see if it had rivets or seams. They viewed it for about 2 minutes. Mr. X said, “It was three times bigger than a blimp.” Mr. X, currently age 60, has flown on a blimp, so he is familiar with how large they can be. When most people compare something to a blimp, they usually mean the Goodyear blimp even though many blimps are much smaller. The Goodyear blimp is 192 feet long, so 3 times bigger could mean almost 600 feet. It had two rows of lights or windows one above the other of about 15-20 windows per row. In addition, it had lights on the bottom. They could not make a more quantitative estimate of its dimensions, height, or distance. They stared at the hovering object for about 2 minutes after which it disappeared instantly. They did not report their sighting. The Ufonalyzer made a search to see if someone else reported this sighting, and no reference was found. Mr and Mrs X, however, claimed that it was on the news from Tucson to back east. However, the only Chino Valley sighting with wide news coverage was the the Phoenix Lights sighting in 1997 (not the alleged flares, but the boomerang shape that occurred a few hours before the flares.) It is possible that their sighting is totally independent of the Phoenix Lights which may have occurred within a few days of their own (meaning their memories incorrectly combined their sighting with the news of the Phoenix Lights) OR their sighting actually occurred on March 13, 1997 and is a previously unknown part of the Phoenix Lights famous sighting. Chino Valley was the second northernmost town in AZ that reported the boomerang object (Paulden being the farthest north, 10 miles farther), but no one has ever reported a huge oval UFO as part of that famous sighting. It is a mystery. Either way, their sighting is a completely unknown one to this time.
The above sketch of the UFO was done by Mrs X in about 20 seconds. Mr. and Mrs. X are hard working, solid citizens and are not wild eyed crazy nuts. They have no reason whatsoever to have invented this story. They are personally known to the Ufonalzyer.
Four theories exist for what might be occurring with vanishing UFOs:
1. TOOK OFF TOO FAST TO SEE
The oldest theory is that the UFO takes off so fast that the human eye just can’t follow it. Paul R. Hill, author of “Unconventional Flying Objects”, was a proponent of that theory. UFOs have been tracked at well over 10,000 mph in our atmosphere, but whether or not they can accelerate in milliseconds so as to fool the human eye into believing they vanished is another thing altogether. A bullet coming out of a gun could be going about 1800 mph and it can’t be seen; everything seems instantaneous. However, if that bullet were a tracer bullet and the observer was somewhat behind the shooter or far away from the shooter, the observer and the shooter can see the (lit up) bullet traveling. Even a non illuminated bullet could be seen at conventional gun velocities if it were, say, as big as a car or even a basketball. A UFO is a pretty large machine and it is generally observed from a distance. Thus it probably could be seen to fly away even it it instantly accelerated to thousands of miles an hour.
Let’s do some estimates. The average diameter of the average sighted UFO is only about 15 feet. Most people think it’s about 40-50 feet, but please see Ufonalyzer’s writeup “Analysis of Historical Alien Close Encounters.” The human reaction time for a visual stimulus is an average of 20-40 milliseconds, so we will use 30 msec. (This is the time it takes for the nerve impulse to get to the brain from the eye and for the brain to notice the movement, and is NOT the time for muscles to react which would be on the order of 200 msec.) The human eye macula (the part of the eye that provides the clear vision area, as opposed to your peripheral vision) subtends an angle of about 16.7 degrees, average. Let’s further assume you are watching a UFO at a quarter mile distance. Let us further assume the impossible that the UFO instantly achieves its full speed from a standstill. How fast would that UFO have to move from a standstill for it to get out of your macula’s field of view within 30 milliseconds? Doing the math, one finds that the macula subtends an arc of 192 feet at a quarter mile. But because the UFO is centered in your vision, the UFO need only move 96 feet to be at the edge of your visual detection. If it moves 96 feet in 30 msec, then it’s traveling 2182 miles per hour. If the UFO were one half mile away, then the speed below which you could discern its travel away from you in a lateral direction would be 4364 mph. At a higher speed than that, it would look like it vanished. But here is a big BUT. BUT, human vision for detecting movement is even more acute outside of the macular area. We have all heard this and it’s true. This means that a human could detect that the UFO traveled away at an even faster speed than 2182 mph instead of vanishing because he would still be able to detect its movement over a wider arc as defined by his peripheral vision. Furthermore, the Ufonalyzer does not believe that UFOs can achieve instant final velocity with zero acceleration time. If this is the case, then the average velocity of the UFO in its first 30 milliseconds of acceleration would mean that the takeoff of the UFO from your field of vision is even more noticeable. This means that even if the quarter mile distant UFO were to achieve a final speed well over 2182, say, 20000 or 30000 miles an hour, once it really gets going, if its average speed within that 1st 30 milliseconds stays below 2182, you should still detect that it flew away, and that it did not vanish. Furthermore, when UFOs generally are seen to accelerate rapidly from a standstill, they often change color as their propulsion system “powers up” immediately prior to leaving or it may exhibit pre-acceleration tilt before it takes off. The vanishing UFOs don’t exhibit either of these traits.
2. ENTERED WORMHOLE, ANOTHER DIMENSION, OR DEMATERIALIZED
Another theory is that the UFO enters another dimension, or goes into a wormhole, or enters “warp speed” mode of operation. This is how many people believe they got here because these hypothetical means of travel avoid the long slower than light voyages between stars. (A variation on these ideas is that the UFO dematerialized. The few UFO cases that have observed this say that a misty area slowly builds around the UFO and it then starts to lose visual clarity. This continues until the mist and visual clarity dissipates into nothingness. The reverse of this process is when the UFO first appears. The process takes several seconds. In this case, the Ufonalyzer believes that what you see is really what is happening: some UFOs have a mode of travel in which its atoms dissociate somehow and coalesce somewhere else.) One of these methods could very well be the means that UFOs use to go between stars. This means, however, might not be very safe to use so close to earth, or it may take large machinery to achieve it, hence the aliens’ use of motherships. After all, if it were easy or safe to use near earth, it would be used most of the time, yet it is not. The vast majority of sightings are of continuously traveling, moving UFOs, and not discontinuously traveling, vanishing, jumping UFOs. Another thing to consider is this: the dimensional and warp speed methods would be so fast as to leave a “hole” in our atmosphere. UFOs do control the atmosphere around them which prevents air friction and this also prevents sonic booms, but both of these features depend on the presence of the UFO to control its surroundings. When or if the UFO vanishes into another dimension, it just suddenly is not there anymore. The vanishing act would leave a vacuum hole in our atmosphere which would rapidly fill with inrushing air from all directions. When the air meets, one should expect to hear a loud pop or crack. It would be like breaking a UFO size light bulb. No one has reported this noise.
3. PROJECT BLUEBEAM
is an alleged project by the government to project huge holograms into the sky. This capability could be used for diversions in time of war or mass propaganda. Simply turning off the holographic projector will cause the image to vanish. It is doubtful that the Chino Valley sighting was a hologram because there would be no reason whatsoever to project a UFO over Chino Valley.
4. USED CLOAKING DEVICE
A fourth theory is that the UFO simply turns on its cloaking capability. This hypothesis for vanishing UFOs avoids the negatives of the other three hypotheses. UFOs seem to be cloaking themselves more these days than in the early UFO years of sightings. They can turn on either radar or visual invisibility separately. This writeup deals solely with visual invisibility. As you know, other UFOs have been videoed with a dual camera simultaneously in both the visible light spectrum and infrared with the result being that the UFO was visible in the infrared light video but invisible in the normal light video. This capability hints at the complete command of photon physics that aliens possess. This theory, by the way, is the one preferred by the Ufonalyzer.
©
CROP CIRCLE MUSINGS by Ufonalyzer 12/09
CROP CIRCLE MUSINGS by Ufonalyzer 12/09
Crop circles appear to have now been embraced as a branch of ufology. Ufonalyzer does not agree with this, but has to go along with it. The UFO field is huge and complicated, and adding this field muddies the waters even further. This one time writeup on crop circles will give his views on this phenomenon for what they are worth which is probably nothing.
Let us go back to basics to get one obvious thing out of the way. You probably recall Doug and Dave with their rope on a board which they used many times to press down the crop to make a hoax crop circle. Is this still going on? Is this the sole way crop circles are formed? This writer believes that the answers are yes and no. Certainly, hoaxers who tend to be unoriginal occasionally copy Doug and Dave’s efforts of the past. There is no way to prevent this. Present day crop circles are much more elaborate and complicated than those of Doug and Dave’s era. Plus, many of them now have the grain pressed down in different directions, further increasing the degree of difficulty of hoaxing a circle with a board. The board does not explain the growth and node anomalies in the grain stalks that Dr. Levengood first exposed. Also, what are those little lights that are occasionally seen near a new crop circle? There’s another problem too. Crop circle hoaxing contests have shown that the biggest and most complex circles just can’t be created in a 5 hour nighttime session even by a team of 3 hoaxers. It just takes too much time. Why 5 hours? Most crop circles are found in England which is very far north, about the same as Hudson Bay in Canada. This translates to summer nights that are about 5 hours long. Therefore there’s something else going on.
Many times investigators who arrive soon enough at a fresh crop circle observe a couple of interesting things.
First, military helicopters sometimes show up. This implies that whatever means created the circle is detectable by likely the same means that the military uses to detect UFOs. (See Ufonalyzer’s writeup on UFO Detection.) This fact alone is enough for most ufologists to place crop circles into the purview of ufology. Certainly the creation of the pattern should be detectable with an infrared satellite, providing it happened to be focused on the correct field of grain. If it were always human hoaxers, one would think that by now the government would have revealed that they detected human forms creating the pattern, but they have not. It is possible that a UFO created the crop circle while still using its cloaking capability, but this is probably not the case as is hypothesized by the second interesting thing, which is:
Second, many times small points of light are seen flying near and emerging from a fresh crop circle. These look like self illuminated mini UFOs about 3 to 4 inches size. If a UFO created the circle under stealth, then why would it leave behind smaller UFOs which are visually detectable? It would not. Where did this size estimate come from? The answer to this can be found in a two hour set of videos that the Ufonalzyer saw on a website like YouTube or Disclose.tv. These videos were of those crop circle lights that are often seen in daylight near a fresh crop circle. In one of the videos, a hawk (or whatever passes for a hawk in the UK (a kestrel?)) is seen to chase down one of these specks of light and catches up to it in mid air and then suddenly veers away and cuts off its chase. (It could also have been a mother bird chasing away a perceived threat.) It realized upon reaching the thing that it was not edible prey. The commentary on the video pointed out the bird chase as it occurred but the commentary was matter of fact, almost dismissive. To this viewer, it was hugely significant because it proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that this was not a hoax light or hoax video. It proved it was not a figment of the viewer’s imagination because an animal saw and reacted to the same thing. It proved it was an object viewable by a bird with eyesight far better than a human’s up to a couple of inches away, and it placed a size range on the light because a hawk would not chase down a big bird but would try to chase down something about as big as itself or smaller. It looked about as big or a bit smaller than the bird that chased it.
The intelligence behind these crop circles does not seem to be as secretive as those that operate UFOs. Crop circles are clearly attempts by the intelligence to openly express itself (as does an artist) or to communicate. UFOs do not do that. It is the Ufonalzyer’s theory that the creators of crop circles are yet another alien intelligence on earth, and this alien intelligence is totally different from those of the UFO operators. Most rational people believe that UFOs are machines operated by beings from technological societies, but the Ufonalzer thinks that the entities creating crop circles are about as alien to the aliens as the UFO operators are to humans. This could be why UFOs are seen on rare occasions near crop circles; they are simply investigating them as we do.
Furthermore, there is a chance that the lights flying around fresh crop circles are the physical manifestations of the entities themselves that created the circle. In other words, the lights are the beings.This implies that a crop circle light may very well be not an extraterrestrial biological entity, but an extraterrestrial non-biological entity; that is, a pure energy entity visible as a plasma ball or perhaps an electronic intelligence housed in a small 3 to 4 inch metal container that can fly.
Crop circles appear to have now been embraced as a branch of ufology. Ufonalyzer does not agree with this, but has to go along with it. The UFO field is huge and complicated, and adding this field muddies the waters even further. This one time writeup on crop circles will give his views on this phenomenon for what they are worth which is probably nothing.
Let us go back to basics to get one obvious thing out of the way. You probably recall Doug and Dave with their rope on a board which they used many times to press down the crop to make a hoax crop circle. Is this still going on? Is this the sole way crop circles are formed? This writer believes that the answers are yes and no. Certainly, hoaxers who tend to be unoriginal occasionally copy Doug and Dave’s efforts of the past. There is no way to prevent this. Present day crop circles are much more elaborate and complicated than those of Doug and Dave’s era. Plus, many of them now have the grain pressed down in different directions, further increasing the degree of difficulty of hoaxing a circle with a board. The board does not explain the growth and node anomalies in the grain stalks that Dr. Levengood first exposed. Also, what are those little lights that are occasionally seen near a new crop circle? There’s another problem too. Crop circle hoaxing contests have shown that the biggest and most complex circles just can’t be created in a 5 hour nighttime session even by a team of 3 hoaxers. It just takes too much time. Why 5 hours? Most crop circles are found in England which is very far north, about the same as Hudson Bay in Canada. This translates to summer nights that are about 5 hours long. Therefore there’s something else going on.
Many times investigators who arrive soon enough at a fresh crop circle observe a couple of interesting things.
First, military helicopters sometimes show up. This implies that whatever means created the circle is detectable by likely the same means that the military uses to detect UFOs. (See Ufonalyzer’s writeup on UFO Detection.) This fact alone is enough for most ufologists to place crop circles into the purview of ufology. Certainly the creation of the pattern should be detectable with an infrared satellite, providing it happened to be focused on the correct field of grain. If it were always human hoaxers, one would think that by now the government would have revealed that they detected human forms creating the pattern, but they have not. It is possible that a UFO created the crop circle while still using its cloaking capability, but this is probably not the case as is hypothesized by the second interesting thing, which is:
Second, many times small points of light are seen flying near and emerging from a fresh crop circle. These look like self illuminated mini UFOs about 3 to 4 inches size. If a UFO created the circle under stealth, then why would it leave behind smaller UFOs which are visually detectable? It would not. Where did this size estimate come from? The answer to this can be found in a two hour set of videos that the Ufonalzyer saw on a website like YouTube or Disclose.tv. These videos were of those crop circle lights that are often seen in daylight near a fresh crop circle. In one of the videos, a hawk (or whatever passes for a hawk in the UK (a kestrel?)) is seen to chase down one of these specks of light and catches up to it in mid air and then suddenly veers away and cuts off its chase. (It could also have been a mother bird chasing away a perceived threat.) It realized upon reaching the thing that it was not edible prey. The commentary on the video pointed out the bird chase as it occurred but the commentary was matter of fact, almost dismissive. To this viewer, it was hugely significant because it proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that this was not a hoax light or hoax video. It proved it was not a figment of the viewer’s imagination because an animal saw and reacted to the same thing. It proved it was an object viewable by a bird with eyesight far better than a human’s up to a couple of inches away, and it placed a size range on the light because a hawk would not chase down a big bird but would try to chase down something about as big as itself or smaller. It looked about as big or a bit smaller than the bird that chased it.
The intelligence behind these crop circles does not seem to be as secretive as those that operate UFOs. Crop circles are clearly attempts by the intelligence to openly express itself (as does an artist) or to communicate. UFOs do not do that. It is the Ufonalzyer’s theory that the creators of crop circles are yet another alien intelligence on earth, and this alien intelligence is totally different from those of the UFO operators. Most rational people believe that UFOs are machines operated by beings from technological societies, but the Ufonalzer thinks that the entities creating crop circles are about as alien to the aliens as the UFO operators are to humans. This could be why UFOs are seen on rare occasions near crop circles; they are simply investigating them as we do.
Furthermore, there is a chance that the lights flying around fresh crop circles are the physical manifestations of the entities themselves that created the circle. In other words, the lights are the beings.This implies that a crop circle light may very well be not an extraterrestrial biological entity, but an extraterrestrial non-biological entity; that is, a pure energy entity visible as a plasma ball or perhaps an electronic intelligence housed in a small 3 to 4 inch metal container that can fly.
UFO DETECTION by Ufonalyzer 12/09
UFO DETECTION by Ufonalyer © 12/09
Decades ago, the Ufonalzyer considered building a UFO detector that he saw in a magazine. It was based on the theory that UFOs somehow use magnetism as their means of propulsion. The detector was a magnet suspended at the end of a naked wire. Around the wire was a loop of another wire, not touching. The two wires were to be hooked to a battery and an alarm. The theory was that the magnetic field of a UFO passing over your house would disturb the magnet and move it. This would cause the wires to touch, sound the alarm, and then you could run outside and see the UFO.
We occasionally encounter weird, offbeat ways to detect various phenomena. Once the weird offbeat method is instrumentized, it then can become integrated into our mainstream society. Smoke and motion detectors are things that may have been considered offbeat decades ago, but now are part of our culture. Who would have guessed 70 years ago that smoke was cheaply detectable by means other than our eyes and noses? We know that polarized light is now used to reveal cracks and stress points in materials. A dog can sniff out cancer in humans, but this capability has not been built into a medical instrument as far as this writer knows, even though we now have chemical sniffers for airport use. We still rely on other means for cancer detection.
We know that UFOs have stealth technology, both for radar and visual invisibility. Videos exist of UFO’s which are invisible in normal videos, but completely visible when videod by an infrared camera. UFOs have the capability to turn their stealth on and off as they see fit. We have a radar detection network for satellites named SPASUR ( SPAce SURveillance ). It projects fanshaped radar beams into the air and outer space and waits for a satellite to go through the fence of energy. Once a satellite goes through, a detector (radar receiver) located a few hundred miles away detects the reflected energy. The radar transmitter and receiver are not co-located as in most radars. But given that UFOs can willfully make themselves invisible to radar, something else has been needed for a long time to get around their stealth technology, and maybe, just maybe, it already exists. [Digression: Most commercial radars do not detect UFOs because they are programmed to “paint” only those objects which return a transponded signal AND which are travelling at velocities which are “conventional”; i.e. the radar is designed to look only for expected human technology objects.] Scientists may have figured out an equally unusual way to detect UFOs which may be radar independent. This is hypothesized in this writeup due to the many times that a UFO is seen shortly followed by jet interceptors which never catch it but do succeed in chasing it away. Our military bases may receive word from some unknown detection network that their planes should be scrambled to go find a nearby UFO. Furthermore, this unknown means of detection may have additional capability to determine “signatures” of the signal which tell the US military if the UFO is benign or hostile. These signatures would be of some emission by the propulsion system that is peculiar to one UFO race or another. This network could be operating independent of but in addition to our already existing radar networks. The bases probably have a UFO officer and flight crews who have been taught procedures about this process, all of which would be secret. These crews and officers are probably strategically located on our bases across the country such that the mean time to go the distance to the UFO is minimized. Hundreds of civilian UFO reports indicate that this MTTU (mean time to UFO) for any spot in the country is on the order of several minutes, not hours. This, however, does not address the means by which the chased UFO was detected to begin with.
What if there were an outgrowth from particle beam weapon research which resulted in, say, a fanshaped transmission of quantum particles which could be detected by sensors of same. This would be a system of detection very much like the aforementioned SPASUR, but not reliant on reflected electromagnetic waves but instead reflected particles? Could that detect UFOs? Maybe. If there is such a system, the Ufonalyzer is betting on something that is based on quantum mechanics.
Instead of active systems of detection where we transmit something into the air and search for a bounceback, maybe UFOs can be detected passively, where their own emissions give them away? Who knows? We have all seen UFO photos which have a fuzziness distortion around the UFO, usually the bottom. Most believe that this is caused by the propulsion system and is believed by most to be a gravity phenomenon. We have ways to measure gravity anomalies, so could there be a way to scan the sky with a gravity anomaly detector? Could UFOs be detectable with polarized light? Is there a detector which can record ionization patches in the sky, where the ionization patch is where the UFO is located?
Human scientists can invent incredibly creative and offbeat means to accomplish an objective. Given that military high tech is decades ahead of what the public knows and uses, our scientists may have solved this one already. Otherwise, how else can the super fast response of our military be explained?
Decades ago, the Ufonalzyer considered building a UFO detector that he saw in a magazine. It was based on the theory that UFOs somehow use magnetism as their means of propulsion. The detector was a magnet suspended at the end of a naked wire. Around the wire was a loop of another wire, not touching. The two wires were to be hooked to a battery and an alarm. The theory was that the magnetic field of a UFO passing over your house would disturb the magnet and move it. This would cause the wires to touch, sound the alarm, and then you could run outside and see the UFO.
We occasionally encounter weird, offbeat ways to detect various phenomena. Once the weird offbeat method is instrumentized, it then can become integrated into our mainstream society. Smoke and motion detectors are things that may have been considered offbeat decades ago, but now are part of our culture. Who would have guessed 70 years ago that smoke was cheaply detectable by means other than our eyes and noses? We know that polarized light is now used to reveal cracks and stress points in materials. A dog can sniff out cancer in humans, but this capability has not been built into a medical instrument as far as this writer knows, even though we now have chemical sniffers for airport use. We still rely on other means for cancer detection.
We know that UFOs have stealth technology, both for radar and visual invisibility. Videos exist of UFO’s which are invisible in normal videos, but completely visible when videod by an infrared camera. UFOs have the capability to turn their stealth on and off as they see fit. We have a radar detection network for satellites named SPASUR ( SPAce SURveillance ). It projects fanshaped radar beams into the air and outer space and waits for a satellite to go through the fence of energy. Once a satellite goes through, a detector (radar receiver) located a few hundred miles away detects the reflected energy. The radar transmitter and receiver are not co-located as in most radars. But given that UFOs can willfully make themselves invisible to radar, something else has been needed for a long time to get around their stealth technology, and maybe, just maybe, it already exists. [Digression: Most commercial radars do not detect UFOs because they are programmed to “paint” only those objects which return a transponded signal AND which are travelling at velocities which are “conventional”; i.e. the radar is designed to look only for expected human technology objects.] Scientists may have figured out an equally unusual way to detect UFOs which may be radar independent. This is hypothesized in this writeup due to the many times that a UFO is seen shortly followed by jet interceptors which never catch it but do succeed in chasing it away. Our military bases may receive word from some unknown detection network that their planes should be scrambled to go find a nearby UFO. Furthermore, this unknown means of detection may have additional capability to determine “signatures” of the signal which tell the US military if the UFO is benign or hostile. These signatures would be of some emission by the propulsion system that is peculiar to one UFO race or another. This network could be operating independent of but in addition to our already existing radar networks. The bases probably have a UFO officer and flight crews who have been taught procedures about this process, all of which would be secret. These crews and officers are probably strategically located on our bases across the country such that the mean time to go the distance to the UFO is minimized. Hundreds of civilian UFO reports indicate that this MTTU (mean time to UFO) for any spot in the country is on the order of several minutes, not hours. This, however, does not address the means by which the chased UFO was detected to begin with.
What if there were an outgrowth from particle beam weapon research which resulted in, say, a fanshaped transmission of quantum particles which could be detected by sensors of same. This would be a system of detection very much like the aforementioned SPASUR, but not reliant on reflected electromagnetic waves but instead reflected particles? Could that detect UFOs? Maybe. If there is such a system, the Ufonalyzer is betting on something that is based on quantum mechanics.
Instead of active systems of detection where we transmit something into the air and search for a bounceback, maybe UFOs can be detected passively, where their own emissions give them away? Who knows? We have all seen UFO photos which have a fuzziness distortion around the UFO, usually the bottom. Most believe that this is caused by the propulsion system and is believed by most to be a gravity phenomenon. We have ways to measure gravity anomalies, so could there be a way to scan the sky with a gravity anomaly detector? Could UFOs be detectable with polarized light? Is there a detector which can record ionization patches in the sky, where the ionization patch is where the UFO is located?
Human scientists can invent incredibly creative and offbeat means to accomplish an objective. Given that military high tech is decades ahead of what the public knows and uses, our scientists may have solved this one already. Otherwise, how else can the super fast response of our military be explained?
ALIEN EVOLUTION--A NEW TWIST by Ufonalyzer 12/09; updated 3/10
ALIEN EVOLUTION—A NEW TWIST by Ufonalyzer 12/09, updated 3/10
Recently the Ufonalyzer updated his spreadsheet* of Alien CE3 (close encounters of the third kind) incidents. This update brought the number of CE3 cases documented by top ufologists of the highest integrity to 298 over a 63 year time span. About 48 different alien races were estimated to have visited based on their different descriptions reported by the witnesses. This led the Ufonalzyer to speculate on why so many alien races seem to be enjoying the benefits of star travel technology while we have not even returned to our moon in 37 years. Maybe we are just too slow.
Modern man first appeared on the scene around 120,000-200,000 years ago. Of course we know he did not just abruptly appear, but evolved to his present state over a period of time. Civilization first appeared about 5,500 years ago, about 3,500BC. Throughout this whole time, mankind always had a struggle to survive against hostile animals, disease, climate, and hostile fellow humans. In addition, mankind always has had a strong belief in religion with its arguable benefit toward his happiness and well being. Animals, climate, hostile social groups, religion, and microbes have all served to impede technological progress. You must admit that we have not followed an efficient, linear path toward arriving at where we are now. Another impediment to progress, particularly toward civilization, was the lack of numbers in the human race. There were so few humans for so long that insufficient numbers to form a group of people large enough to develop social organization, art, government, labor specialization, etc (in other words, civilization) just was not possible, nor were these things even necessary given the sparseness of our numbers. Eventually, in recent millenia sufficient numbers became available that groupings large enough to trigger civilization occurred, resulting in Egyptian, Mesopotamian, and a few other civilizations which independently appeared within about 500 years of each other. But on the whole, one could say that man’s potential and attributes which have existed for 120,000 to 200,000 years have been wasted, resulting in a very low standard of living for most of that time**. We have had civilization for about 2%-4% of that time, and the civilized portion of our existence has not been much to brag about either.
It is likely that alien races can trace their own emergence into their current form and intelligence back to a certain time of beginning too, just as we have done. Most people believe that the reason they are so advanced compared to us is because their race is so much older than ours. After all, UFO sightings have been occurring for thousands of years.
It is just as likely that many alien races who have visited earth are much younger than ours, and that we are laggards, having shown poor progress toward high tech relative to the aliens. Believing that all these races are so much older than our own assuages the human ego, just as so many other of our beliefs are ego driven. Consider a hypothetical new alien race with few emotions which has evolved into its present form 120,000-200,000 years ago on a planet where worldwide benign climatic conditions with no ice ages have existed for eons, much as our dinosaurs used to enjoy. Also hypothesize an average IQ of, say, 140 (ours is 100), few lethal microbes, few natural predators, and a reasonablly low birth rate. It is very reasonable to expect that this alien race, due to its unemotional and unexcitable psyche plus optimal planetary environment, would not be overly aggressive toward one another and try to kill each other off, nor would they lock themselves into thousands of years of non-progress while they pursue dogmatic belief systems. Nor would they continuously tell themselves that they are something special and are top dog in the universe. This race could achieve the “threshold” population level necessary to start civilization in a fraction of the time that it took us humans, say 20,000 years. From that point, it could be a mostly smooth upward progression without dark ages, famine, wars of annihilation, and technical stagnation brought about by incorrect beliefs. It is conceivable that they could have achieved our own current level of technical sophistication after 1,000-2,000 years after their version of civilization began as compared to our own 5,500 years. Going onward from there, they achieve star travel by some means or in another 200-2,000 years, so that they could have started visiting neighboring stars in perhaps 25,000 years after emerging from whatever primordial environment that spawned them. This would give such a civilization about 95,000 to 175,000 years to explore and pull further ahead of us even though they emerged as a race at the same time we did.
Another couple of reasons exist for our slow progress compared to aliens. One is our own lifespan. We each have about 70-80 good mental years on our agendas. Aliens, due to their superior technology and simpler physiologies have anywhere from 150-500 years of mental acuity according to close encounter information. Our knowledge base is built by stacking one generation's learnings onto the previous generations' learnings. Each successive generation must relearn it's previous generations' knowledge before adding new knowledge. Aliens probably must go through this same process, but living two to eight times longer gives a huge boost in efficiency towards progress. Another possible reason is their mental telepathy. This ability probably helps in acquiring base learning so that our process of going through K-12 plus another 4 college years might actually be compressed into only a couple of years for telepathic variety aliens.
This hypothetical scenario is not really that far fetched. One can see that even a race that may have emerged even 50,000 years ago still would have had plenty of time (25,000 years based on the previous assumptions) to explore other solar systems and to appear as glyphs on our rocks and as UFO’s in our Renaissance paintings.
Of course we are doing the best we can given the script that we're given inherent in our makeup. But let's not cop out and use the excuse that they have had more time to develop. It just may not be true at all.
All of the previous has been about technology, and not about much else. Due to humanity’s long and rich history of tragedy, retrenchment, and fitful development, we have learned to appreciate things cast in the light of our past. We carry our past with us, in our surroundings, and in our behavior all of the time. Aliens do not seem to do this. Perhaps this means that they have not had the time to develop in the social area even though they are technically advanced.
After all is said and done, the Ufonalzyer still favors the theory that most of the alien visitors belong to races that are older than ours, but certainly one has to allow that quite a few could be younger.
*spreadsheet located at:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aj0F2i1zgohJdEVzNko2YWswUnVTRS0yUDF6OURDalE&hl=en
**This is not all mankind’s fault as can be shown by the near extinction of all mankind 60,000 to 2,000,000 years ago as revealed by DNA mutation rate studies. Many scientists believe that 74,000 years ago appears to be the most favored date for this population “bottleneck” and most believe this really almost happened. The prevailing belief for the cause is volcanism.
©
Recently the Ufonalyzer updated his spreadsheet* of Alien CE3 (close encounters of the third kind) incidents. This update brought the number of CE3 cases documented by top ufologists of the highest integrity to 298 over a 63 year time span. About 48 different alien races were estimated to have visited based on their different descriptions reported by the witnesses. This led the Ufonalzyer to speculate on why so many alien races seem to be enjoying the benefits of star travel technology while we have not even returned to our moon in 37 years. Maybe we are just too slow.
Modern man first appeared on the scene around 120,000-200,000 years ago. Of course we know he did not just abruptly appear, but evolved to his present state over a period of time. Civilization first appeared about 5,500 years ago, about 3,500BC. Throughout this whole time, mankind always had a struggle to survive against hostile animals, disease, climate, and hostile fellow humans. In addition, mankind always has had a strong belief in religion with its arguable benefit toward his happiness and well being. Animals, climate, hostile social groups, religion, and microbes have all served to impede technological progress. You must admit that we have not followed an efficient, linear path toward arriving at where we are now. Another impediment to progress, particularly toward civilization, was the lack of numbers in the human race. There were so few humans for so long that insufficient numbers to form a group of people large enough to develop social organization, art, government, labor specialization, etc (in other words, civilization) just was not possible, nor were these things even necessary given the sparseness of our numbers. Eventually, in recent millenia sufficient numbers became available that groupings large enough to trigger civilization occurred, resulting in Egyptian, Mesopotamian, and a few other civilizations which independently appeared within about 500 years of each other. But on the whole, one could say that man’s potential and attributes which have existed for 120,000 to 200,000 years have been wasted, resulting in a very low standard of living for most of that time**. We have had civilization for about 2%-4% of that time, and the civilized portion of our existence has not been much to brag about either.
It is likely that alien races can trace their own emergence into their current form and intelligence back to a certain time of beginning too, just as we have done. Most people believe that the reason they are so advanced compared to us is because their race is so much older than ours. After all, UFO sightings have been occurring for thousands of years.
It is just as likely that many alien races who have visited earth are much younger than ours, and that we are laggards, having shown poor progress toward high tech relative to the aliens. Believing that all these races are so much older than our own assuages the human ego, just as so many other of our beliefs are ego driven. Consider a hypothetical new alien race with few emotions which has evolved into its present form 120,000-200,000 years ago on a planet where worldwide benign climatic conditions with no ice ages have existed for eons, much as our dinosaurs used to enjoy. Also hypothesize an average IQ of, say, 140 (ours is 100), few lethal microbes, few natural predators, and a reasonablly low birth rate. It is very reasonable to expect that this alien race, due to its unemotional and unexcitable psyche plus optimal planetary environment, would not be overly aggressive toward one another and try to kill each other off, nor would they lock themselves into thousands of years of non-progress while they pursue dogmatic belief systems. Nor would they continuously tell themselves that they are something special and are top dog in the universe. This race could achieve the “threshold” population level necessary to start civilization in a fraction of the time that it took us humans, say 20,000 years. From that point, it could be a mostly smooth upward progression without dark ages, famine, wars of annihilation, and technical stagnation brought about by incorrect beliefs. It is conceivable that they could have achieved our own current level of technical sophistication after 1,000-2,000 years after their version of civilization began as compared to our own 5,500 years. Going onward from there, they achieve star travel by some means or in another 200-2,000 years, so that they could have started visiting neighboring stars in perhaps 25,000 years after emerging from whatever primordial environment that spawned them. This would give such a civilization about 95,000 to 175,000 years to explore and pull further ahead of us even though they emerged as a race at the same time we did.
Another couple of reasons exist for our slow progress compared to aliens. One is our own lifespan. We each have about 70-80 good mental years on our agendas. Aliens, due to their superior technology and simpler physiologies have anywhere from 150-500 years of mental acuity according to close encounter information. Our knowledge base is built by stacking one generation's learnings onto the previous generations' learnings. Each successive generation must relearn it's previous generations' knowledge before adding new knowledge. Aliens probably must go through this same process, but living two to eight times longer gives a huge boost in efficiency towards progress. Another possible reason is their mental telepathy. This ability probably helps in acquiring base learning so that our process of going through K-12 plus another 4 college years might actually be compressed into only a couple of years for telepathic variety aliens.
This hypothetical scenario is not really that far fetched. One can see that even a race that may have emerged even 50,000 years ago still would have had plenty of time (25,000 years based on the previous assumptions) to explore other solar systems and to appear as glyphs on our rocks and as UFO’s in our Renaissance paintings.
Of course we are doing the best we can given the script that we're given inherent in our makeup. But let's not cop out and use the excuse that they have had more time to develop. It just may not be true at all.
All of the previous has been about technology, and not about much else. Due to humanity’s long and rich history of tragedy, retrenchment, and fitful development, we have learned to appreciate things cast in the light of our past. We carry our past with us, in our surroundings, and in our behavior all of the time. Aliens do not seem to do this. Perhaps this means that they have not had the time to develop in the social area even though they are technically advanced.
After all is said and done, the Ufonalzyer still favors the theory that most of the alien visitors belong to races that are older than ours, but certainly one has to allow that quite a few could be younger.
*spreadsheet located at:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aj0F2i1zgohJdEVzNko2YWswUnVTRS0yUDF6OURDalE&hl=en
**This is not all mankind’s fault as can be shown by the near extinction of all mankind 60,000 to 2,000,000 years ago as revealed by DNA mutation rate studies. Many scientists believe that 74,000 years ago appears to be the most favored date for this population “bottleneck” and most believe this really almost happened. The prevailing belief for the cause is volcanism.
©
UFO CRASHING VIDEO by Ufonalyzer 12/09
UFO CRASHING VIDEO by Ufonalyzer 12/09
There is a short video that has been around for at least 4 to 5 years or more of a UFO crashing. It can be found at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4987931999759537743#
and other internet locations as well. It is titled “UFO Crash”, but it does not seem to generating any buzz in spite of its clear portrayal of the event. The ufonalyzer has read a short sentence or two about the video in a couple of spots on the internet and these claim that it is a 1997 test missile crash at White Sands, NM. This storyline is probably misinformation to reduce the impact of what is being seen right before our very eyes. This video has never been portrayed as being a hoax, nor does it look like one. The problem with this video, then, is of how it is being protrayed, and NOT whether it has been faked. So it is either a UFO or a man made object crashing, and it really is probably crashing at White Sands.
Why is it a real UFO?
1. It appears to be a discoid shape, but a cylindrical missile could provide a side view that could possibly appear like this does in the video.
2. At the very beginning of the video, the object is plummeting to the earth at about a 45 degree angle, and then it tries to come out of its dive such that by the time first impact is made with the ground it hits at about a 30 degree angle. Thus it is retaining some type of flight capability until the last second and it is under some sort of control. To effect the change in its fall, its propulsion system must be providing power to make a sharp turn. If it were a missile, one could see the rocket exhaust as the engines are firing and there is no evidence of that. A UFO uses field propulsion whose only known indications of a high power turn on are as follows:
a. UFOs often exhibit an increase in self luminosity because they apparently ionize the air around them as they “power up.” This object is obviously pretty brightly self luminous.
b. Many videos of UFOs show visual distortion around the object, particularly at the bottom. This video shows this too, so that the thing looks a lot like a jellyfish with dangling tentacles, the tentacles being the distortion of the antigravity field in full operation. The Ufonalyzer saw this only when he went to look for it on full screen.
3. It is obviously self luminous. Missiles are not. Now, one could say that this aircraft is malfunctioning and is glowing due to heat perhaps caused by high speed. The speed of this UFO is pretty low. The video shows 3 telephone poles in the foreground being passed during the crash sequence (a 4th pole is estimated in the sequence.) They appear to be about 4 times closer to the camera than the UFO is. Standard AT&T telephone pole spacing practice in rural areas is 132 feet, so if the UFO is 4 times further away than the poles, it horizontally traverses 2100 feet in the 14 seconds until second impact. This is only 150 mph. Given the gross estimates being made, the speed could easily be twice as high, or even slower. Obviously its speed has been reduced at first impact and as it seeks to come out of its dive, but for sure this object is NOT glowing due atmospheric friction due to its slowness.
4. The bounce after first impact of the object is very impressive and indicative of high structural strength. What little is known of UFO crashes shows that it takes a lot of abuse to fragmentize a UFO.
Now, one may ask if this is UFO, then why didn’t it use its “instantaneous” turn, start, stop capability to come out of the crash? The Ufonalyzer’s response to this is that it is disabled due to some malfunction or to having been shot which is why it is crashing in the first place.
White Sands has a long UFO history, predating even the Roswell event. This UFO may have been snooping around and could have been shot down. Taken in their collective entirety, it is hoped that these observations make a convincing case that this video really is of a crashing UFO.
©
There is a short video that has been around for at least 4 to 5 years or more of a UFO crashing. It can be found at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4987931999759537743#
and other internet locations as well. It is titled “UFO Crash”, but it does not seem to generating any buzz in spite of its clear portrayal of the event. The ufonalyzer has read a short sentence or two about the video in a couple of spots on the internet and these claim that it is a 1997 test missile crash at White Sands, NM. This storyline is probably misinformation to reduce the impact of what is being seen right before our very eyes. This video has never been portrayed as being a hoax, nor does it look like one. The problem with this video, then, is of how it is being protrayed, and NOT whether it has been faked. So it is either a UFO or a man made object crashing, and it really is probably crashing at White Sands.
Why is it a real UFO?
1. It appears to be a discoid shape, but a cylindrical missile could provide a side view that could possibly appear like this does in the video.
2. At the very beginning of the video, the object is plummeting to the earth at about a 45 degree angle, and then it tries to come out of its dive such that by the time first impact is made with the ground it hits at about a 30 degree angle. Thus it is retaining some type of flight capability until the last second and it is under some sort of control. To effect the change in its fall, its propulsion system must be providing power to make a sharp turn. If it were a missile, one could see the rocket exhaust as the engines are firing and there is no evidence of that. A UFO uses field propulsion whose only known indications of a high power turn on are as follows:
a. UFOs often exhibit an increase in self luminosity because they apparently ionize the air around them as they “power up.” This object is obviously pretty brightly self luminous.
b. Many videos of UFOs show visual distortion around the object, particularly at the bottom. This video shows this too, so that the thing looks a lot like a jellyfish with dangling tentacles, the tentacles being the distortion of the antigravity field in full operation. The Ufonalyzer saw this only when he went to look for it on full screen.
3. It is obviously self luminous. Missiles are not. Now, one could say that this aircraft is malfunctioning and is glowing due to heat perhaps caused by high speed. The speed of this UFO is pretty low. The video shows 3 telephone poles in the foreground being passed during the crash sequence (a 4th pole is estimated in the sequence.) They appear to be about 4 times closer to the camera than the UFO is. Standard AT&T telephone pole spacing practice in rural areas is 132 feet, so if the UFO is 4 times further away than the poles, it horizontally traverses 2100 feet in the 14 seconds until second impact. This is only 150 mph. Given the gross estimates being made, the speed could easily be twice as high, or even slower. Obviously its speed has been reduced at first impact and as it seeks to come out of its dive, but for sure this object is NOT glowing due atmospheric friction due to its slowness.
4. The bounce after first impact of the object is very impressive and indicative of high structural strength. What little is known of UFO crashes shows that it takes a lot of abuse to fragmentize a UFO.
Now, one may ask if this is UFO, then why didn’t it use its “instantaneous” turn, start, stop capability to come out of the crash? The Ufonalyzer’s response to this is that it is disabled due to some malfunction or to having been shot which is why it is crashing in the first place.
White Sands has a long UFO history, predating even the Roswell event. This UFO may have been snooping around and could have been shot down. Taken in their collective entirety, it is hoped that these observations make a convincing case that this video really is of a crashing UFO.
©
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)